Image: JasonUnbound

In likely the largest single financial meltdown since the Great Depression, I feel inclined to beg of you to run out and buy a new Chevy to bolster the ailing auto industry. But, that’s not really what this feature is about. What got us into this mess likely won’t get us out – that is, buying new cars we don’t need or can’t afford. So, in the spirit of the Union-made conveyance, this installment of Best Economical Used Cars goes to the first-generation Pontiac Vibe / Toyota Matrix.

The GM/Toyota alliance has a rich, yet somewhat little-known history. Since 1984, the NUMMI (New United Motor Manufacturing Inc.) plant in Fremont, California has employed UAW workers.  The plant has assembled brand-shared rides like the ’85-’88 Chevy Nova (Toyota Corolla Sprinter), ’90-’02 Toyota Corolla / Geo-Chevy Prizm, the Tacoma, many exported combinations, and the thrifty, wagon-like Vibe/Matrix (including the right-drive version called “Voltz”). These cars are essentially a tall, Corolla wagon/crossover with a Toyota drivetrain and GM bits-and-pieces (60% Toyota, 40% GM). Yep, it’s a strange brew, but a tasty one for sure.

Since their inception in 2003, both models carried their own unique styling and options, yet shared the same DNA under their clothing. Over the model years, some could be bought with All-Wheel Drive, sport packages like the 164 SAE Horsepower XRS (Toyota), and a 6-speed manual transmission. The base 1.8L models offered 126 HP and a 5-speed manual or 4-speed autobox.  At their core, the twins shared the commonality, utility, and efficiency of the Corolla – but with a bonus: cargo capacity.

To meet the qualifications of this segment, reliable, quality vehicles have to be easily found, with low mileage, and at a reasonable price.  A quick search revealed several units in the sub-100K mile range, for as little as $6,000-$7000.   Pontiac models run a bit cheaper, but it’s just brand identity and nothing more.  The Toyota has the same parts, different logo.

On the Inside: The vehicle accomplishes quite a lot in it it’s entirety. The interior trim is basic and plasticky, but who cares? The look and substance exudes durability.  Feature content includes a 115V inverter to connect AC items — to charge a cell phone, etc.  This vehicle is designed for efficient convenience.

The driver’s seat is tall and nearly identical to the Corolla.  Although adjustable, the seating position is rather awkward and uncomfortable.  Nevertheless, controls are easy to reach and the instrument cluster exudes an attractive glow with its deeply inset, electroluminescent gauges.  One observation: my driving position blocks a clear view of the speedometer by the small steering wheel (duck-n-view).  To keep costs down, the Pontiac radio unit and vent outlets are placed in both models.   Small nitpicks, but the driver’s position is rather funky.  Overall, the feel is tall-crossover instead of (dare I say) “Wagon”.

The cargo area is where this vehicle excels. The rear seats fold flat (including the front passenger seat) to allow the transport of long items. It’s a true wagon, so expect that sort of utility (and appearance).  Tie-down loops and channels, a tough, hard plastic load floor, and minimal wheel-well intrusions make hauling easy.  Cleanup of cargo spills are a snap.  Who needs a small truck when a good hatchback will do?

Interior Images: stephenHUBBARD

Rear seat passengers may find the legroom a bit cramped if adults are the passengers, but short trips are OK.  If kids tag along, then no worries.  When the rear seats are in the up and locked position, cargo space finds itself a bit tight.  Remember, this is a compact 5-door — which makes it a real fuel miser, but small on proportions.  The Toyota is a bit more refined on both interior and exterior appearances, including the optional leather interior. Teamed-up with cargo capacity, fuel economy is the best benefit.

Pontiac Vibe

Image: Hendrixson

On the Outside: Both iterations share the same sweeping roofline, wedgy front and rear aspects, and 5-door silhouette.  The Toyota has a smoother look to the eye, with full cargo glass instead of the Pontiac’s stylish notch (which creates a bit of a blind spot).  GT and XRS models look sporty and play the part with larger alloy wheels, foglamps, side sills, and a rear spoiler.  The Pontiac exudes a Fisher Price-esque durability with hard plastic cladding, a roof rack, and sharply angled styling cues.

Under the Hood and ‘The Drive’: Pop the lid, and you’ll find the bulletproof Toyota 1ZZ-FE mill (the 2ZZ-GE is found in high-output models).  Choose the 5-speed manual for optimal efficiency.  As is usual in North America, most cars you’ll find are automatics.  The trick is to keep the speed at or below 70 MPH to avoid transmission kickdown on hills, and consistently high revs at cruise.  Fuel economy drops significantly at speeds above the 70-mark.   Keep it steady, and you’ll be rewarded with a variable valve timing response that’s punchy, especially in the mid-range, along with a combined fuel economy in the 30′s.  Crisp, small-car handling is the norm from even base trim levels.  Body roll is minimal, and the ride is compliant.  The automatic shifts firmly and is quick to downshift to the optimal RPM.  It’s still a fun car to drive despite what its personality may indicate.

The Data:

Vehicle Tested: 2008 Pontiac Vibe Base
Engine: 1.8L Toyota Powerplant with VVT — rated at 126 HP and 122 lb-ft torque, 4-speed Auto
EPA Class: Small Station Wagon
EPA FE: 25 City / 31 Highway
Averages as Tested: 35.5 MPG at 57 MPH avg, over 455 miles.
Route: Kansas City – Wichita, KS – Kansas City (hit rush hour on the return)
Weather Conditions: 40F – 55F, Wind Speed vs. Heading: NW @ 5 MPH. Course 1 = SSW; Return = NNE

If you liked this post, sign up for out RSS Feed for automatic updates.

Real World Review: 2009 Toyota Corolla LE
+ Super Efficient
+ Expected Reliability
+ Handling

- Keeps Getting Bigger Every Re-design (how many times do I have to write this)?
- Low-quality interior feel
- Painful Seating Position in lower-end models

Introduction: The 10th Generation, 2009 Corolla is already out, and it was ripe for the picking. It’s rare anymore to find a variety of FE-friendly vehicles on the lot, so it was selected. I wonder how it’s changed since its redesign?

For Toyota, the Corolla has been the solid poster child of efficiency and simplicity for decades, and all over the world. It sells and sells. As expected this year, it gained some weight – 200 lbs. The base 1.8L now has dual variable valve timing and likely some tweaks to make it more of a fuel sipper. At a glance, the Cd seems to have improved.

If you want more power, a 2.4L engine sourced from the Camry is available. Furthermore, leather, Sat-Nav, and a nifty stereo system can be added. The model tested was the “Rental’s Choice” LE, thankfully without the gaudy fake wood trim.

One note before we get started – you can tell Toyota is slipping on quality. The Interior is one place to easily note this. Secondly, a faulty fuel gauge indicated ¾ tank instead of full on pickup. I immediately went to the pump only to squeeze 0.8 gallons into the tank. Later I noticed the gauge at full, after driving a while. Not good.

This could all be stricken from the record after you see the gas mileage…

On the Outside: I think this is where they spent the most money on the redesign. The exterior has a sporty new looks and a younger feel. The 15” wheels shown are standard. Otherwise, the slab-sided sedan looks run-of-the-mill.

The rear shot seems to be the most attractive, with inset reflectors and a stylish lamp wraparound. The test vehicle was “Blue-Streak Metallic”, which was a striking color and spiced up the overall look and impression. Heated mirrors were equipped with this trim level.

On the Inside: Well, a bit of a disappointment. In this area, it appears as if the Korean makes could be overtaking interior quality. Fit and finish is clunky, and would it kill them to put some padding on the armrest! There’s nothing like driving down the highway resting your elbow on a cinder block. Don’t get me started on the “Park Bench” driver’s seat. You get the picture…

Optional Equipment Shown

Controls were placed within an easy reach, and the instrumentation average. The A/C was frigid and finally, the vents were redesigned to not blow cold air into your eyeball. But the center stack looks like it was taken out of the Kia/Hyundai Spectra/Elantra. Storage bins, nooks, crannies, and a double-door glove box make it practical.

One complaint: the clock was part of a “select-one” instrument cluster menu (and who knows how to set it)? I just used my cell phone or the GPS. Speaking of which, the SG had to be discluded from MPG and speed tests since the speedo was about 5% off. For the first time, though, the speedometer was spot-on with the GPS.

More on the instrument cluster – the display at the left cycled through: Instant FE, average FE, Time of Day, Timer, and Outside Temp. The tripometer had 2 memory positions.

The trunk is good for the car’s size, with a wide opening. Rear seat passengers have little room and a dual cupholder. If the driver is short, you might squeeze 4 people in there. It’s rated for 5 – I call dibs on the window.

Safety: Side-curtain airbags are standard on all models, which will likely earn it a top safety pick. The driver’s bag is deployed based on the weight of the driver. 4-wheel ABS is also standard. Optional are traction/stability controls.

Efficiency: The FE is definitely an improvement over the last model, which says a lot. The outbound leg was calculated at 43.1 MPG. This could be artifact based on the overfill, so the average from the car’s readout and the pump will be taken for both legs. The total averaged FE was 37.9 MPG! This could very well be the most efficient, non-hybrid tested.

The Drive:: Standard compact car fare here. Handling is superb, but the ride is a bit unsettling. Chassis rigidity is up, but there’s a shudder over bumps – similar to a convertible, but less pronounced. The feel is rather “large-car”, with soft responses to dips and undulations. The car is still tossable in the corners. I would recommend some additional tweaking for a more solid feel.

For the Energy Conscious: A manual transmission is available in the “S” and Base models with the 1.8 engine. The S adds sporty touches like ground effects and smoked headlamps and foglamps, and 16-inch wheels. This also opens the door for leather and satellite navigation. The base model is likely the best option with smaller wheels and less overall weight of options.

Consider the size of vehicle you need. This car may fit the bill for young families looking for an efficient, compact sedan. Others out there: Mazda 3, Civic, Kia/Hyundai Spectra/Elantra, Lancer, Sentra.

Raw Data — Specs:
Model: 2009 Toyota Corolla
Trim: LE
Class Size: Compact Sedan
Transmission: 4-speed automatic with lock-up torque converter
Engine: 1.8L DOHC, 16-Valve, I-4 with dual, intelligent variable valve timing
Rating: 132 hp at 6000 RPM and 128 lb-ft torque at 2400
Performance: 0-60 in 9.1 seconds; Skidpad – 0.83g; Slalom – 63.3 MPH
Drivetrain: FWD
Seating Capacity: 5 (very snug) at 2+3 or 4 more comfortably at 2+2
RPM @ 60 MPH: 2400
Price as Tested: $16,750 USD (May, 2008)
ECU Target Coolant Temp: 190F
Curb Weight: 3523 lbs.
EPA: 27/35
EPA Average Fuel Cost per Year: TBD
Emissions: ULEV-II

Raw Data — Stats:
EcoModder Tested Mileage: 37.9 MPG
Speed Avg: 63 MPH
Time of Operation: 2.6 hours
Distance Driven: 446 Miles
Ambient Outside Temp: 60-80F
Cruise Speed: 70-75 MPH
Test Loop: Kansas City – Des Moines – Kansas City
A/C Usage: ~10% of time
Wind/Weather: Outbound – humid, sunny, slight tailwind; Inbound: Party Cloudy, 15 MPH Headwinds gusting to 20
Driving Style: Average

If you liked this post, sign up for out RSS Feed for automatic updates.