View Single Post
Old 06-11-2009, 02:36 PM   #2 (permalink)
MetroMPG
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 8,658

Blackfly - '98 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 78.84 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 106.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 69 Times in 49 Posts
The airflow near the front tires is rarely travelling straight towards them, so the design of successful tire deflectors may not be intuitive.

High pressure at the bumper may be forcing flow both down and outwards, which is one reason why OEM spats don't extend out to the edge of the tires (they'd be overkill if they did, pushing air further out than necessary).

Some OEM spats that are angled similar to your Figure B would be subject to perpendicular flow! (Of course, it depends on the vehicle.)

One Volvo study found that even very small changes in spat size / positioning can have a negative effect (increase drag). I'll see if I can dig it up...

This is a tough one to guess at!
__________________
Latest project: removable Geo Metro boat tail
Latest test: Massive cardboard air dam on a Geo Metro


www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote