View Single Post
Old 07-16-2009, 11:20 PM   #18 (permalink)
Old Tele man
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,037

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.85 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 28.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 51
Thanked 266 Times in 204 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
At the LEAST they could have come up with a successor that continues to make use of that nice 1.0 three-banger. Could have been a great engine; today's "small block Chevy".
...my thoughts exactly!

...I'm not saying GM should've dropped any their engineering search for "...more HP from fewer cubes..." but rather that they should've concurrently downsized existing engines in 'cid' while maintaining same HP output! That way a smaller engine, with same HP would be used in the same chassis to achieve ever increasing MPG.

...in other words: two races: (1) upward for HP from same cid, and (2) downward for displacement for same HP.

...heck, I was a "dyed-in-the-wool" MOPAR guy during my younger days (had a 70½ AAR'Cuda 340/6BBL), but these days I wouldn't even think about a FIAT-managed HEMI Challenger (ha,ha)!
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SIDI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote