View Single Post
Old 03-01-2008, 01:11 PM   #6 (permalink)
MetroMPG
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,914

Blackfly - '98 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 67.07 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 107.11 mpg (US)

U.F.O. - '00 Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 83.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 239
Thanked 847 Times in 471 Posts
Here's the author's disclaimer about the wind tunnel data, from Construction of Test Apparatus - Wind Tunnel (p.8):

Quote:
Upon calculating Reynold's number with respect to the length of the model truck, the flow was found to be laminar. In the real world, flow over a vehicle traveling at highwa speeds (around 55 mph) is turbulent. Therefore, turbulent flow was desired. However, after many failed attempts to change the cross-sectional area of the wind tunnel inlet, roughing up the surface of the model... and even attempting to speed up the single-speed motor, and consulting Dr. Said Dini of the Mechanical Engineering Department, it was concluded that this could not be done with this particular wind tunnel. Therefore, all drag coefficient results are for laminar flow.
__________________
Latest project: removable Geo Metro boat tail
Latest test: Massive cardboard air dam on a Geo Metro


www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote