View Single Post
Old 03-04-2008, 07:41 AM   #9 (permalink)
MetroMPG
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,531

Blackfly - '98 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 67.07 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 125.37 mpg (US)

U.F.O. - '00 Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 85.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 300
Thanked 1,016 Times in 566 Posts
Hi Barwelle - welcome to the site....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barwelle View Post
The canopy on that truck is very boxy, which obviously will increase its drag. Most of the canopies on trucks (atleast, most of the ones I see) are rounded off, and have a cleaner profile than this one.
IMO, the biggest problem with the cap shown is that it appears to be wider and slightly taller than the profile of the cab. Add to that the sharp corners on those projections, and yes, it's going to be worse than a new cap.

But probably not dramatically worse. The problem, as andrewj pointed out is the size of the trailing wake - that's where most of the drag is. With a cap - rounded corners or not - it's going to be big, nearly 100% of the size of the projected frontal area.

Quote:
I just wanted to point out a couple of things that could change the results that, I'd say, the majority of other people would get if they did this. I plan to do a similar experiment this summer, except I plan to do it with a week, or a month, for each different setting.
I'd love to know what you're driving and how you plan to test it.

Note that testing by the month or tank will produce much less accurate data than these guys got, because you can't control for weather, temperature, different trip profiles (speed, traffic) etc.
__________________
Latest project: removable Geo Metro boat tail
Latest test: Massive cardboard air dam on a Geo Metro


www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote