View Single Post
Old 10-14-2009, 05:44 PM   #85 (permalink)
MetroMPG
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,531

Blackfly - '98 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 67.07 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 125.37 mpg (US)

U.F.O. - '00 Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 85.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 300
Thanked 1,016 Times in 566 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcp123 View Post
Doesn't seem that much different to how I calculate MPG improvements...change something, go through my usual driving cycle, observe the results.
I bet: the vast majority of drivers see enough variation in the fuel economy of their "usual driving cycle" without even changing anything that results from that approach would be statistically insignificant.

You'd have to be measuring something that provides a massive change for it to rise above the static.

That said, I hold the testing regimen of a person or magazine hawking a product or junk science to tougher standards than the average Joe trying to figure out if, say, his cardboard air dam (or whatever) is helping his MPG. Meaning: I'm less inclined to jump down Joe's throat if his testing isn't rigorous, though I'll still be respectfully skeptical of claimed results.
__________________
Latest project: removable Geo Metro boat tail
Latest test: Massive cardboard air dam on a Geo Metro


www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
Christ (10-14-2009)