View Single Post
Old 10-14-2009, 11:11 PM   #12 (permalink)
MetroMPG
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,531

Blackfly - '98 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 67.07 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 125.37 mpg (US)

U.F.O. - '00 Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 85.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 300
Thanked 1,016 Times in 566 Posts
Pulse and glide absolutely beats driving with load, in my experience.

But I've given up P&G for longer highway trips simply because I find it taxing on me, and it stands to reason it's also harder on the car.

Quote:
Why does DWL work?
Does it? Is it simply causing a lower average speed and thusly saving gas?
Does it work compared to what?

I guarantee it's more efficient than "cruise control" style driving, or even constant throttle driving, even at the same average speed. Mostly, I suppose, because momentum on downgrades isn't squandered through engine braking, which is likely to happen on cruise control, and may possibly happen even with the constant throttle approach.

DWL is a happy medium between pulse & glide and cruise control/brainless throttle use.

PS: I actually prefer to think of driving with load as "target driving", since when I do it, I normally pick a "target" MPG, and modulate the throttle to achieve/maintain it on the instant MPG readout. I don't ever actually monitor the LOD value on the ScanGauge.
__________________
Latest project: removable Geo Metro boat tail
Latest test: Massive cardboard air dam on a Geo Metro


www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote