View Single Post
Old 11-28-2009, 01:43 AM   #4 (permalink)
Sean T.
EcoMod Wannabe
 
Sean T.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lake Orion, MI
Posts: 440

Taurusaurus Rex - '97 Taurus GL (Sedan)
90 day: 18.61 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 13 Times in 8 Posts
A longer and narrower cargo carrier would probably be more efficient, but not enough to validate the cost of buying a new one when you already have one that isn't damaged.

If the one you have now ends up breaking or is damaged or something and you need to buy a new one, I would say it would be worth a little extra to get a long narrow one (assuming they might be more expensive?) but not at this point.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sean T. For This Useful Post:
CROSS CANADA WITH 8 (11-28-2009)