View Single Post
Old 12-06-2007, 02:48 PM   #8 (permalink)
MetroMPG
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,532

Blackfly - '98 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 67.07 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 125.37 mpg (US)

U.F.O. - '00 Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 85.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 1,018 Times in 568 Posts
The comments at GCC are typical high-quality. I recommend going through them.

My favourite:

Quote:
So what they found can pretty much be described as
"It depends on the car model whether or not you won't get a mileage decrease. And no single blend fits the bill."
On top of that, you can be sure that the co-sponsor American Coalition for Ethanol is acutely aware of the fact that it is next to impossible for the average motorist to distinguish any effect on their fuel economy (outside of normal tank to tank variation) by fuelling their vehicle with an ethanol blend.

In the LABORATORY they were able to discern a 1% and 3% improvement in the non-optimized vehicles. By its nature, fuel additive testing is really difficult to do outside of a lab.

Joe Public has no hope of discerning a change of that size over the course of a tank in real world conditions, never mind understanding the concept of wishful thinking and experimenter bias.

Yet ACE knows that if they can get media coverage, Joe Public is going to pick up on this story and go try it.

It's almost as if they watched the whole acetone debacle and said, "hey we can do that too, but on a corporate scale!"
__________________
Latest project: removable Geo Metro boat tail
Latest test: Massive cardboard air dam on a Geo Metro


www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote