View Single Post
Old 01-26-2010, 09:29 PM   #7 (permalink)
Frank Lee
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
It's an interesting idea and on the surface it has more merit than the regular ho ho ho systems.

I too fall into the trap of not thinking about others' driving conditions. As a semi-rural flatlander, it's hard to imagine city stop-n-go, mountainous areas, etc. I'm in an area with lots of stop-n-go and steep hills right now and it's much different than what I'm used to. I totally hate it but I'm on the brakes much more per mile. I still have the factory brakes on my '94 with over 100k but now I doubt that even I could have achieved that here in the urban hills.

Related to what Bob said, in a hilly area weight is paramount and if the needed equipment is heavy it is even less likely to pay back.

The other day I discovered I could coast engine off for miles going downhill, but the fe still sucked because I could only go uphill in the low gears.
__________________


  Reply With Quote