View Single Post
Old 12-07-2007, 12:20 PM   #1 (permalink)
MetroMPG
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,533

Blackfly - '98 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 67.07 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 125.37 mpg (US)

U.F.O. - '00 Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 85.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 1,018 Times in 568 Posts
MetroMPG.com mailbag: why don't you test acetone?

MetroMPG.com visitors have sent me this question more than a few times.

The most recent:

Quote:
Have you tried adding 2 or 3 ounces of acetone to 10 (US) gallons of fuel? I have read it increases mileage, but have never tried it.
The short answer is: no, I haven't tried it, and I don't have any plans to.

The long answer is:
  • Testing fuel additives outside of a laboratory is extremely difficult to do, because of the lack of control over external variables that can affect the results.
  • I will only attempt to test things that can be easily & quickly added/removed from the car so that data can be collected immediately before and after the change, under identical environmental conditions, in an A-B-A manner (and I should add: absent all other traffic, on cruise control, averaging bi-directional runs on a level, straight road). Fuel/oil additives obviously present a problem to that approach. And even this approach is far from the ideal.
  • Some people have tried evaluating fuel additives (& other modifications) based on frequently repeated, identical trips in "normal" driving - e.g. their daily commute - despite varying weather & traffic conditions. I don't have a regular commute, so that's not an option for me.

    Besides, I'm personally not comfortable drawing conclusions from those conditions, because there's no control over changing weather & traffic variables, not to mention not being able to exclude the experimenter's own behaviour (driving) from the test.
Some people have persisted: Why don't I just try adding some and see if it makes a difference?
  • Because not being able to do an A-B-A test under conditions that are as controlled as possible, I'd have little confidence that any difference I might see could be attributed to the acetone (or insert name of any other fuel/oil additive) vs. some other uncontrolled effect.
  • On top of that, I haven't seen any sound scientific explanation for why acetone should work.
I tend to agree this skeptical view of acetone: http://www.fuelsaving.info/acetone.htm

It's worth a read if you haven't seen it already.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
Latest project: removable Geo Metro boat tail
Latest test: Massive cardboard air dam on a Geo Metro


www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote