View Single Post
Old 08-28-2010, 03:27 AM   #13 (permalink)
euromodder
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Failed State Belgium
Posts: 2,956

Hägar - '05 V50 1.6L Diesel
Diesel
90 day: 52.27 mpg (US)

Snert - '06 S40 1.6L Diesel
90 day: 58.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 283 Times in 228 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfg83 View Post
Yes, but I think DFCO has a strategic purpose for us.
However, if I can get engine-braking + DFCO on the downhill, I can avoid using my brakes and risking dangerous speeds.
Going down a rather steep incline, you obviously have no choice but to remain in gear and use engine braking.

If gravity is propelling your car, DFCO is better than coasting with the engine on as there is no fuel use at all using DFCO.

But on the near-flat terrain where I live, engine-on coasting is definitely better for FE than DFCO and trying to brake as little as possible.
__________________



Lifetime fuel consumption :
  Reply With Quote