View Single Post
Old 02-10-2011, 04:20 PM   #24 (permalink)
Piwoslaw
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,700

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,274
Thanked 731 Times in 464 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
Do you have any idea why acceleration wasn't better through the whole rpm scale, but was actually worse below 1500 and above 4000rpm, even though the pressure drop was greatly reduced? Would this imply that just swapping the intake for something larger would harm performance and/or fuel economy when the driver's style keeps rpms between 1000 and 2000?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian Edgar View Post
My idea for this is explained in the article.
OK, I went back and studied the graph and text again, and I see that I was in error! Acceleration is actually better below 1500 rpm than with the stock intake. The y-axis of the graph is in g's, not in seconds, as I had thought.
My bad, terribly sorry about that.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote