View Single Post
Old 05-22-2008, 09:24 AM   #9 (permalink)
MetroMPG
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,533

Blackfly - '98 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 67.07 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 125.37 mpg (US)

U.F.O. - '00 Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 85.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 1,018 Times in 568 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyGrey View Post
Forget the scangauge. It lacks the accuracy and the resolution to tell you anything meaningful.
That's not my experience using one in controlled conditions. The last series of back-to-back runs I did testing vortex generators had a standard deviation of .6%. I'd call that decent resolution. It's less important that the absolute MPG readings are 100% accurate, as long as the relative differences are consistent.

---

However, I would say that tank-to-tank "testing" of acetone is a waste of time. Too many variables involved to draw a conclusion. Despite the ambition, and the title of this thread, you're not going to "get to the bottom of this" on the road.

EDIT: the "idle" method you describe with a graduated cylinder would be more reliable. Don't forget you need to account for fuel return as well (if your van has a fuel return line).
__________________
Latest project: removable Geo Metro boat tail
Latest test: Massive cardboard air dam on a Geo Metro


www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote