View Single Post
Old 06-28-2008, 10:59 PM   #13 (permalink)
brucepick
Hypermiler
 
brucepick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern CT, USA
Posts: 331

Sven - Volvo 240 wagon (semi-retired) - '89 240 wagon
90 day: 25.57 mpg (US)

Lean Burn Civic - '97 Civic HX
90 day: 40.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Yes I agree with what's already been posted:
Circumferential grooves will be better than crosswise grooves.
'Performance' tires will likely have higher rolling resistance to get better traction.

Also pay attention to the tire's weight (you can see weight in TireRack specs). Rotating weight is supposedly 3x as harmful to your mpg as non-rotating weight, which is why people bother looking for lightweight alloy rims.

BUT here's what I did when I bought tires nearly a year ago:
I made sure I got tires rated for 44 psi, and not 32 or 35 psi.
If I'd had the money available I might have gotten tires rated at 52 psi.

I dared to run my old 35 psi tires around 40. I run the new 44 psi tires around 52. I don't think I'd want to run 35 psi tires that high. The increased pressure really helps fuel economy.

A few years ago there were some efforts to get specs published for all new tires, showing their rolling resistance. Big business (that's Big Oil) and government got together, and made sure that legislation got killed off. If you're reading this in the USA, be sure to vote this November!
__________________
Driving Lean Burn '97 Civic HX with tires at 50+ psi. '89 Volvo 240 is semi-retired. I did love that car though!
  Reply With Quote