View Single Post
Old 09-11-2017, 04:43 PM   #15 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,438

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,207
Thanked 4,387 Times in 3,361 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedDevil View Post
The mountain launch pipe cannot be vacuum, but we could superheat it and blow a lot of steam through.

The human body can endure large G forces when it is floating in water. As it weighs the same as water it could endure almost limitless G forces - except for air and gases in the lungs and bowels.
Is a tube even necessary? Couldn't a maglev railgun accelerate at practically any rate, or is the tube the cheaper option?

I can't see a vacuum tube being feasible or practical.

Having the rocket use onboard propellant while being accelerated defeats the purpose of the accelerator; to reduce the required mass of onboard fuel. Rockets are already about 85% fuel, by weight. Of that fuel, something like 85% of it is used to accelerate the remaining fuel.

Providing ground based acceleration logarithmically reduces the amount of fuel required to take a vehicle to orbit or escape velocity.

Can the body really withstand sustained 10+ G acceleration rates if surrounded by water? The brain is encased in fluid, and yet people get concussions fairly easily.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote