View Single Post
Old 09-13-2017, 12:46 AM   #63 (permalink)
The Atomic Ass
Master EcoModder
 
The Atomic Ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mason, OH
Posts: 535

Overland - '24 Nissan Versa S 5MT
90 day: 40.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev View Post
I disagree, we have had 50mpg+ cars for over 30 years. It would not be a tax on low incomes, it would be a tax on poor decisions.

And high mpg cars are cheaper than low mpg cars, further making it nonsensical to call it a tax on the poor.
Actually, going on my own observed evidence, the poor buy whatever is available used. Which isn't a lot of Prius'. There's the occasional 4-cylinder car, but most are V6 and larger, and I see in my daily driving (delivery driver) a LOT of ratty SUVs.

So yes, it WOULD be a tax on the poor, at least for a decade or more.

And personally, even though in my job I'm shelling out around $5,000/yr for gas, I can't yet justify the payments of a new car.
__________________

Last edited by The Atomic Ass; 09-13-2017 at 12:55 AM..
  Reply With Quote