View Single Post
Old 09-20-2017, 04:53 PM   #7 (permalink)
COcyclist
Aero Wannabe
 
COcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738

TDi - '04 VW Golf
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 53.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 705
Thanked 218 Times in 169 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikesheiman View Post
Was reading an article on A Brilliant View Into Aerodynamics - Speedhunters.

It struck me as odd and possibly contradictory that the images actually seem to recommend having an open area right behind the tire (virtually no fairing), as opposed to a fairing directly behind it gradually sloping inwards. Even though, obviously, those designs still push/keep air away from the front and sides of the tires.

Any ideas how/why this works or why, in comparison, having a fairing directly behind the wheels may prove better aerodynamically?
Interesting article. Thanks for the link. In the examples above, these cars are designed for huge downforce and tire grip which is often contradictory to low drag aerodynamics for better mpg. We hypermilers tend to drive at lower speeds with skinny tires tucked inside the bodywork. To answer your question, this works for this race car designer because it helps generate downforce. Exposed wheels will not help with a low drag design. Look to solar racers and salt flats streamliners to see cars designed for low drag aerodynamics.
__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801


Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to COcyclist For This Useful Post:
Xist (09-20-2017)