View Single Post
Old 10-12-2017, 08:16 PM   #301 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
With a couple of days running the Li-Fe, I'm seeing a 10% improvement in economy. MPGuino was sitting on just under 6l/100km for the tank, now sitting at 5.5 (tank data reset with the battery disconnect).

I hooked up my battery charger to see how full the alt is keeping the battery.

With a Pb, it would take about 20mins to charge to full even if you connected the charger immediately after turning off the engine. That's about 2Ah on my charger. In normal use, I'd connect the charger about once a week, it took about 4hours to bring the battery up to float (~30Ah).

So I connected my Li-Fe to the charger, stood there as it settled into the appropriate charge mode, and it was done within 2 mins!

I think it's clear then why the alt has less work to do. Pb batteries need to be kept full for maximum life but unfortunately their charge efficiency drops to 50% as they reach that point - a lot of wasted energy. What's really disappointing is that OEM's still aren't offering this tech in any numbers, the real world fuel savings should justify the expense for at least the 'ECO' versions of ICE cars.

PS: I have this 12v Automotive LiFe charger:

https://no.co/g7200

Much easier than messing with hobby chargers

__________________






  Reply With Quote