View Single Post
Old 01-25-2018, 02:40 PM   #4 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kach22i View Post
The dysfunction of these full sized trucks is phenomenal, clearly something has got to change, something like folding side gates.
The front end of the new GM pickups looks like the broad side of a barn. Sure glad the manufacturers successfully lobbied to replace sealed beam bulbs with composite ones to facilitate those low, sloping, aero front ends. Now we get these nice (sarcasm), expensive yellowing plastic P.O.S. instead of inexpensive glass units that retain like-new performance over their entire working lives.

I'm wondering if the driver of said pickup could see a sedan or coupe in front of them? Maybe it's equipped with rear AND forward vision cameras.

"Dysfunction"- Ha Ha, function has little to do with this. It's about cylinder count, high "H-Point", how chicken isht the owner is, and how small the owner's gonads are. They already have the motorized running boards; I'm waiting for them to introduce the ingress/egress integrated escalator.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
aerohead (01-27-2018), slowmover (01-28-2018)