View Single Post
Old 03-07-2018, 03:44 PM   #2 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,456

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,211
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
So that's about a 13% reduction in fuel economy.

Things to consider:

New tires always get poor fuel economy until they wear in a little.
Measure the circumference of the new tire vs old. A larger circumference will under-report distance travelled and throw off speed and MPG estimates.

Certainly the non-LRR tires resulted in a reduction in MPG, but I find it difficult to believe 13% less. I would think different tires would account for only a 5% or less difference.

Factor in the fact that you'll have to replace the tires more frequently. That's a big cost that could offset fuel savings.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
Xist (03-07-2018)