View Single Post
Old 04-06-2018, 06:32 PM   #58 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,460

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,212
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
Why do you think that? Essentially all of modern science & technology was developed by the US & western Europe, with a combined population that only reached the 500 million level a few decades ago.

Because that's a fairly common ballpark estimate of the population which the Earth can sustain, while allowing everyone a fairly decent standard of living. If you have a better one, I'll listen.
Because it took exactly the number of people who have existed, and currently exist, for things to be as they are now. It took all of the competition, all of the conflict, all of the innovation, all of the failed ideas, and all of the successful ideas from billions of people to arrive at the level of technology and prosperity we now enjoy.

Reduce the competition, reduce the number of minds, and reduce the diversity of thought, and you reduce the number of human experimenters, and the number of useful innovations.

I don't know what the ideal population would be. Currently it seems fine to me, but I question that anytime I have to get somewhere in Portland between the hours of 6am and 7pm. I'm also not expert enough to know what challenges a large population will have on resource availability in the future.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote