View Single Post
Old 04-09-2018, 12:11 PM   #13 (permalink)
Ecky
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,014

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 40.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,869
Thanked 2,513 Times in 1,553 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapriRacer View Post
Ah ..... Mmmmm ...... not exactly.

The data seems to point to wider and taller being better. See my web page on the subject:

Barry's Tire tech - Rolling Resistance and Fuel Economy

The best guess as to why that is is that the increase in load carrying capacity causes a greater reduction in RR than the effect the smaller volume of material.

But, again, a tire size change is so small a change if everything else is equal, that it's hardly worth mentioning! Differences in the make and model of tire are SOOOO much larger.
I wonder why it is then, that most of the fuel economy "supercars" (even those made recently) have used very narrow tires with tall aspect ratios? Is it aerodynamics? Surely VW had this data when designing the XL1.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
ksa8907 (04-09-2018)