View Single Post
Old 01-28-2008, 06:48 PM   #3 (permalink)
MetroMPG
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,533

Blackfly - '98 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 67.07 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 125.37 mpg (US)

U.F.O. - '00 Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 85.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 1,018 Times in 568 Posts
Autospeed quoted a paper written by Volvo’s Dr Simone Sebben (SAE paper 2004-01-1307) about an un-named vehicle with a total drag coefficient of 0.29.

The list of parts of the car and their contribution to total drag show the cooling system as the worst offender:

Parts ... Percentage of Total Drag

Cooling package (including radiator, intercooler, oil cooler, etc) ... 33.4%
Exterior ... 31.7%
Front wheels ... 13.1%
Rear wheels ... 6.9%
Floor ... 6.9%
Rear Axle ... 3.1%
Engine ... 3.1%
Front Suspension ... 1.4%
Exhaust ... 0.7%



Source: Modifying Under-Car Airflow, Part 1

The only red flag in that data to my eyes is the label in the graph: "including radiator, intercooler, oil cooler, etc". If the vehicle in question actually has all those components, it likely has more cooling system drag than our small cars, which only have radiators.
__________________
Latest project: removable Geo Metro boat tail
Latest test: Massive cardboard air dam on a Geo Metro


www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote