View Single Post
Old 01-08-2009, 09:04 PM   #14 (permalink)
The Atomic Ass
Master EcoModder
 
The Atomic Ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mason, OH
Posts: 498

2-Wheeled Mule - '06 Burgman 400
90 day: 84.89 mpg (US)

Max - '01 S-10 LS
90 day: 24.7 mpg (US)

Twin Powa - '05 Ninja 250
90 day: 79.09 mpg (US)

Ransom - '01 Bravada
90 day: 16.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to The Atomic Ass
Quote:
Originally Posted by dichotomous View Post
that window is a hole in the wall thermally. I dont care if you have the new super awsome R-5 windows or even R-10 windows which I'd sure like to see! a 2x4 wall has an R value of 19, a 2x6 wall with layer of foamboard on the outside as well is better than R-30. the roof should be R-50 or more. so that 0-8 R rating on the window, is a thermal hole.
This has gotten me into thinking. If one were to design a window, double or triple-paned, with a vacuum between the panes, would this result in a satisfactory increase in the R value?
__________________

ASE certified day-dream engineer

I'm making beautiful music's now, hear it and like me on Facebook!
  Reply With Quote