View Single Post
Old 02-27-2009, 09:15 PM   #217 (permalink)
MetroMPG
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,533

Blackfly - '98 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 67.07 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 125.37 mpg (US)

U.F.O. - '00 Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 85.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 1,019 Times in 568 Posts
Cd: the main issue is that you can't compare EPA ratings against readings taken at a constant speed. (Even considering the Aerocivic has a drivetrain that the EPA never tested in the first place, as Mike points out.)

The EPA's "highway" fuel economy rating is actually an entire simulated "trip" - from rest, then varying "highway" speeds (up and down, in a range from 30-60 mph), and then to rest again.

Comparing that rating to actual MPG @ some steady speed is apples to oranges.

I'd even say that most cars will significantly exceed their EPA highway ratings where MPG is measured at a steady 60 mph.
__________________
Latest project: removable Geo Metro boat tail
Latest test: Massive cardboard air dam on a Geo Metro


www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote