View Single Post
Old 11-27-2007, 11:37 PM   #3 (permalink)
MetroMPG
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,537

Blackfly - '98 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 67.07 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 125.37 mpg (US)

U.F.O. - '00 Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 85.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 1,020 Times in 568 Posts
The key question in the first set of data is:

How reliable are the results? I didn't do multiple runs without changing variables to see how close the results would be.

So I went back...

---

I did 4 runs tonight without changing anything on the car, and each was longer than the previous one.

Which tells me:

1) The drive train was still warming up (tires warming & pressure increasing, bearing temps going up, tranny oil warming up, etc.). I drove a "cold" car straight to the hill, roughly 6 km.

2) The runs I did previously would have suffered from the same effect, (I drove on a "cold" car straight to the hill) which means the effects noted would likely have been even larger if the runs had been done with stable drivetrain temps.

So that's crummy. There's no time saving in having a local test track, because I would have to drive around for half an hour just to get the car warmed up for valid, repeatable runs.
__________________
Latest project: removable Geo Metro boat tail
Latest test: Massive cardboard air dam on a Geo Metro


www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote