| 2010-07-07 |
150 |
1.45 |
|
103.45 |
"" |
| 2010-07-12 |
156 |
1.55 |
|
100.65 |
"" |
| 2010-07-26 |
123 |
1.33 |
|
92.48 |
"" |
| 2010-07-30 |
114 |
1.27 |
|
89.76 |
"rear brake mounted, some extra friction.
some long parts highway on higher speeds." |
| 2010-08-03 |
132 |
1.48 |
|
89.19 |
"some highway parts at higher speeds and vacuum hose outside my rear streamline, this caused the higher fuelconsumption." |
| 2010-08-06 |
124 |
1.24 |
|
100 |
"normal cruising speeds on highway.
base of rear streamline is now mounted." |
| 2010-08-13 |
147.9 |
1.43 |
|
103.43 |
"" |
| 2010-08-17 |
137.3 |
1.31 |
|
104.81 |
"" |
| 2010-08-20 |
97.6 |
1.23 |
|
79.35 |
"" |
| 2010-08-24 |
130.5 |
1.19 |
|
109.66 |
"placed the vacuumhose back inside streamline, on the airfilterbox, where it belongs. the loss of power with a ""pressure-pulse"" because of a truck or just some wind is now gone. the reason why it's now gone and was there before ( unwanted ) is unknown.
i don't like a CV-carb with an own thought !!!!" |
| 2010-08-27 |
121.2 |
1.13 |
|
107.26 |
"" |
| 2010-08-30 |
148.5 |
1.37 |
|
108.39 |
"Running very nice, no changes made.
tested the top speed and she does a confortable 80 MPH !
( i have done this with some thoughts of serious motordamage. the gears have been changed but i have no RPM gauge! )" |
| 2010-09-01 |
119.9 |
1.11 |
|
108.02 |
"" |
| 2010-09-06 |
122.4 |
1.15 |
|
106.43 |
"removed a small part of my streamline, this was very experimental and not stable enough to do lots of miles. also i am experimenting with the CV carb. ( wich gives less power and very little change. )
running one grade hotter sparkplug at the moment and trying to run leaner. no progress made untill now. ( what a difference a programmable EFI would make ! )" |
| 2010-09-08 |
120.5 |
1.23 |
|
97.97 |
"bugger, i'm ashamed i'm under 100MPG again. the experimenting with the CV carb has done some negative progression. also i'm sometimes driving slightly faster then i would like. 65 to 68 mph is more expensive then the 60 i would like to drive. also there was a lot of wind this week, maybe that's also a bad thing........." |
| 2010-09-13 |
134.2 |
1.41 |
|
95.18 |
"" |
| 2010-09-15 |
120.5 |
1.32 |
|
91.29 |
"" |
| 2010-09-20 |
120.5 |
1.18 |
|
102.12 |
"replaced some of the side fairing and done some less fast pieces on the highway. result ! ( see the distance, scary to have the same result ! )" |
| 2010-09-22 |
118.1 |
1.01 |
|
116.93 |
"driving alone works best. my own speed and timing is better for the efficiency." |
| 2010-09-27 |
118.1 |
1.02 |
|
115.78 |
"" |
| 2010-09-29 |
118.7 |
1 |
|
118.7 |
"" |
| 2010-10-04 |
122.4 |
1.03 |
|
118.83 |
"" |
| 2010-10-06 |
122.4 |
1.05 |
|
116.57 |
"" |
| 2010-10-12 |
118.7 |
1.06 |
|
111.98 |
"made a start with the engineering of a next version.
it's going to be a 0.125L fourstroke two-wheeler with 6 gears, a full fairing and a lot less drag." |
| 2010-10-15 |
123 |
1.07 |
|
114.95 |
"crashed on the highway in very busy traffic. a strip of tar in the moist road and dark weather was not amused with my front tire. it would not let the tire go over it because it was in the driving direction and a lot mm above the surface of the road. first road-hit for me in 19 years of motorbiking!
+1 , and very happy i'm only very bruised.
the recumbent is a bit different without some fairing, i wonder what the fuel consumption will be now........." |
| 2010-10-19 |
118.1 |
1.24 |
|
95.24 |
"some fuel has been spilled into my fairing due to some time in the ""dude-you-are-90-degrees-from-normal!!!!"" position.......
;-)" |
| 2010-10-22 |
119.9 |
1.26 |
|
95.16 |
"motorbike runs quite well but some fairing is still missing." |
| 2010-10-26 |
120.5 |
1.25 |
|
96.4 |
"some fairing is still missing." |
| 2010-11-02 |
120.5 |
1.21 |
|
99.59 |
"some fairing is still missing and i have noticed that my rear brake is far from free during a drive." |
| 2010-11-08 |
124.3 |
1.38 |
|
90.07 |
"" |
| 2010-11-16 |
126.1 |
1.49 |
|
84.63 |
"" |
| 2010-11-19 |
118.1 |
1.39 |
|
84.96 |
"i have started rebuilding the side fairing, next refill should give a better result.........." |
| 2010-11-23 |
118.7 |
1.28 |
|
92.73 |
"" |
| 2010-11-26 |
118.1 |
1.2 |
|
98.42 |
"" |
| 2010-12-10 |
118.7 |
1.46 |
|
81.3 |
"" |
| 2010-12-14 |
118.1 |
1.25 |
|
94.48 |
"" |
| 2011-01-14 |
118.1 |
1.54 |
|
76.69 |
"" |
| 2011-01-18 |
118.7 |
1.54 |
|
77.08 |
"" |
| 2011-01-21 |
117.4 |
1.49 |
|
78.79 |
"" |
| 2011-01-31 |
118.1 |
1.48 |
|
79.8 |
"" |
| 2011-02-02 |
117.4 |
1.31 |
|
89.62 |
"" |
| 2011-02-14 |
120.5 |
1.22 |
|
98.77 |
"" |
| 2011-02-21 |
130.5 |
1.33 |
|
98.12 |
"" |
| 2011-03-15 |
165.3 |
1.67 |
|
98.98 |
"" |
| 2011-03-21 |
142.9 |
1.41 |
|
101.35 |
"" |
| 2011-03-24 |
174 |
1.62 |
|
107.41 |
"" |
| 2011-03-28 |
165.9 |
1.56 |
|
106.35 |
"" |
| 2011-04-20 |
173.4 |
1.53 |
|
113.33 |
"" |
| 2011-04-27 |
160.9 |
1.29 |
|
124.73 |
"" |
| 2011-05-09 |
180.8 |
1.47 |
|
122.99 |
"" |
| 2011-05-13 |
185.8 |
1.53 |
|
121.44 |
"" |