Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-27-2012, 09:51 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: PNW
Posts: 150
Thanks: 19
Thanked 29 Times in 23 Posts
Dodge Ram 2500 diesel engine comp mods...

Truck... 2005 dodge ram 4x4 diesel with 3" lift, 34" tires & AT. Started another thread in the aero forum regarding mods I have in mind to clean up the underside of the truck. [pfth... cant post a link to the other thread... Its over in the aero mod forum if anyone wants to read it, I will up date this once I have 3 more posts ] http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post336473

Under the hood I have a few other ideas I need feedback on... 1st off there are performance mods that have brought me from 15~16 up to 17~17.5 mpg. Have the stock airbox, AFE Torque tube down to the stock turbo, AFE Arcflo intake horn, smarty programming, stock DP into an Aero 4040 muffler into a 30" magnaflow muffler.

So... mode 1, port the airbox and attach a hose to it in such a way that it would draw air from the back of the engine by the firewall so it is warmer than what it gets from the front... (I'm convinced the motor gets the best performance when ambient air temps are at 80~85F). I have the torque app that I can monitor intake air temps with and am thinking of a 2~3" electric exhaust cutout to control flow in the event it gets hotter than what I'm after.

Second mod would be to draw that warm air across the fuel rail to warm up the rail a tad bit. Going this way as I think it's the best way to use the heat that is under the hood vs adding an electric heating method. On the flip side of the coin...one mod I did a while back on my last gas truck was to cool the fuel. This gave me a 6% average bump in mpg over the 1600 miles I tested the mod on... did approx 800 w/o the cooler than 800 with, cant argue with the data. This plus other mods took that truck from 11.5 mpg up to 14.5, 2000 ram 1500 4x4.

Again the truck is getting about 17.5 mpg on the hiway, this was before swapping out wheels & tires, had 33" 12.5 wide 18's on chrome wheels. Now there are taller, narrower tires on a different wheel that shaved 9# off ea wheel. I have not measured the current mpg yet so I dont know where it sits now. The goal is to get up to 20~21 mpg on the hiway doing approx 65 mph.

Anyways, what do you guys think?


Last edited by steve05ram360; 10-28-2012 at 05:42 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-27-2012, 11:23 AM   #2 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,184

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,527 Times in 2,801 Posts
You don't want a warm air intake on a diesel. As long as you can keep your intake manifold temperatures above 30'F to 40'F its all good.
You don't want warm fuel unless you can heat it to about 300'F. There was a study posted on here that showed fuel economy and power dropped off as fuel was heated, until it hit 300'F.
The only time warm air and warmed fuel will help you is winter cold starts. Besides that your injectors are burried inside the cylinder head, the fuel gets plenty hot before it gets injected when the engine is warm. You dont want too hot of fuel going to that expensive CP3 injector pump.

What I think is don't try gas engine eco mods on a diesel and loose that muffler and run the shortest possible straight pipe you can get away with.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.

Last edited by oil pan 4; 10-27-2012 at 11:30 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 12:52 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: PNW
Posts: 150
Thanks: 19
Thanked 29 Times in 23 Posts
hummm interesting. So cooling the fuel to a point would probably be good then...??? Are you aware of anyone actually putting warming fuel to the test?

the idea I have for the air hose plumbing would be that it is flexible so I could go either way with the hose. As for the air temp... while the butt dyno is not ever calibrated performance is noticeably better every time it is in the upper 80's, low 90's. Just cant control it since it's ambient. The goal would be to be able to get better control over the intake air temp and measure fuel economy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 05:05 PM   #4 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,443

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,209
Thanked 4,388 Times in 3,362 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve05ram360 View Post
Truck... 2005 dodge ram 4x4 diesel with 3" lift, 34" tires & AT...
The lift is hurting your FE more than anything else. It seems funny to talk about an underbelly when the truck is standing so tall and has such large tires.

Quote:
So... mode 1, port the airbox and attach a hose to it in such a way that it would draw air from the back of the engine by the firewall so it is warmer than what it gets from the front... (I'm convinced the motor gets the best performance when ambient air temps are at 80~85F)...

Second mod would be to draw that warm air across the fuel rail to warm up the rail a tad bit... On the flip side of the coin...one mod I did a while back on my last gas truck was to cool the fuel. This gave me a 6% average bump in mpg over the 1600 miles I tested the mod on... did approx 800 w/o the cooler than 800 with, cant argue with the data.
Sure we can argue with the data. We have no idea how you controlled other variables or how you measured anything. In one sentence you say warm fuel will improve FE, the next sentence you say cold fuel improves FE. Which is it?

On what principle of physics does heating or cooling the fuel improve the thermodynamic properties of combustion?

Quote:
I have not measured the current mpg yet so I dont know where it sits now. The goal is to get up to 20~21 mpg on the hiway doing approx 65 mph.

Anyways, what do you guys think?
I think you should chart your current MPG so that you have a baseline to compare with. Even better yet, do ABA testing with any mod that might affect aero or rolling resistance. Without this, there will be no evidence that any work you do has any benefit.

20mpg at 65mph should be achievable from a stock truck. Stop modifying the truck in ways that hurt FE, and improve the efficiency of the driver; this will help the most.

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve05ram360 View Post
hummm interesting. So cooling the fuel to a point would probably be good then...??? Are you aware of anyone actually putting warming fuel to the test?
Warming or cooling fuel just isn't something worth bothering with. It's not going to make a noticeable difference, and the truck is already designed to operate within a range of temperatures.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 08:40 PM   #5 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,184

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,527 Times in 2,801 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve05ram360 View Post
hummm interesting. So cooling the fuel to a point would probably be good then...??? Are you aware of anyone actually putting warming fuel to the test?
One of the other diesel guys posted a study about fuel heating. I think it was by some university.

The only OEM that tested fuel heating/cooling that I know of was cummins marine, they found that fuel sent to the pump at a tempertuare of 75'F seemed to preform best.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 08:50 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ignition

Any one know about the plasma ignition system. I want to make plasma ignition myself, Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 05:32 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: PNW
Posts: 150
Thanks: 19
Thanked 29 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
The lift is hurting your FE more than anything else. It seems funny to talk about an underbelly when the truck is standing so tall and has such large tires.
I understand that the lift hurts FE, thus the reason for the other post. Since my truck sees off road enough to bump up the ride height to begin with, it needs to stay. The other post I did was intended to get some feedback on the ideas I had about helping out under there as much as possible.


Quote:
Sure we can argue with the data. We have no idea how you controlled other variables or how you measured anything. In one sentence you say warm fuel will improve FE, the next sentence you say cold fuel improves FE. Which is it?
Well the data was pretty simple since I did the mod in the middle of the trip... 800 mi going up mpg = x, 800 mi going back, mpg = 8 + 6.5%. It was the posts I read here that are claiming the FE goes up with warmer fuel, all of this relating to gas engines only. I do know that testing I did do on a dyno with a fuel cooler setup on a stock engine yielded a max gain of approx 13% in both hp & tq. Every gas motor I did this mod to had a nice butt dyno felt bump in the low-mid range rpms, only 1 motor did I dyno it before & after on the same dyno on the same day w/o pulling the car off the rollers. I believe there should be an ideal number to get the intake air temp & fuel temp to get the most out of it (diesel). Since when the ambient temps are in the 85~95ish range smoke output drops and motor feels stronger it leads me to believe that at those temps it is getting the best burn in the cylinder.

Quote:
On what principle of physics does heating or cooling the fuel improve the thermodynamic properties of combustion?
Cant answer that, can only point to the before & after data I collected. I can say though that the "after" data had ambient air temps close to the 90's (gas engine) so if anything the gains might have been higher.


Quote:
I think you should chart your current MPG so that you have a baseline to compare with. Even better yet, do ABA testing with any mod that might affect aero or rolling resistance. Without this, there will be no evidence that any work you do has any benefit.

20mpg at 65mph should be achievable from a stock truck. Stop modifying the truck in ways that hurt FE, and improve the efficiency of the driver; this will help the most.
Heading up to Washington Thursday morning with a light load so I will be seeing where it sits then. I have seen 20 mpg 2x in this truck, 1st it had 2.5" of lift with a wider well worn set of tires that were heavier than what I have on there now. the other time was with a tire 1" taller than the 34" tire that I have on there now, that had the same 3" lift thats on there now. At 65 mph the motor is spinning right around 1700 rpms which is around where the peak torque is. Another thing I can do is run a loop I"ve run in the past which was something like 100~120 mi and do before & after runs on the mods. Since I'm not working, regular runs like that are out of the question for now.


Quote:
Warming or cooling fuel just isn't something worth bothering with. It's not going to make a noticeable difference, and the truck is already designed to operate within a range of temperatures.
I disagree on this one... it's an area of opportunity IMO. Someone also suggested straight piping the exhaust, also a bad idea (already did it years back & lost mpg) Free flowing exhaust like that will help develop the most power under WOT conditions.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 05:41 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: PNW
Posts: 150
Thanks: 19
Thanked 29 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
One of the other diesel guys posted a study about fuel heating. I think it was by some university.

The only OEM that tested fuel heating/cooling that I know of was cummins marine, they found that fuel sent to the pump at a tempertuare of 75'F seemed to preform best.
I believe the OEM testing back then wouldnt be targeting the best FE, look at what they are doing today with full size trucks with it being common to be getting over 20 mpg .

Funny thing though about the 75F number you posted, the heater in the fuel filter housing is set to turn off @ 70~80*... I read something like that a few years back which made me think it might be worth looking into. On another diesel forum guys started putting fans on a cooler that was on the return line to the tanks to keep the in-tank temps from climbing to much. Some (but not all) reported back better FE from it.

I will go and do the testing anyways and see what it looks like. If no gains, then at least there will be a thread on it that someone can refer to.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 05:41 PM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: PNW
Posts: 150
Thanks: 19
Thanked 29 Times in 23 Posts
whats ABA testing?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 05:54 PM   #10 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,184

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,527 Times in 2,801 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve05ram360 View Post
whats ABA testing?
Something you cant test unless you are willing to undo a mod after its been put on and tested.

__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com