Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-18-2017, 12:59 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,013

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 41.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 466 Times in 287 Posts
Effect of lift kit on gas mileage

Here's a guy that lifted his Jeep Cherokee and compared gas mileage before and after:

I regret lifting my daily driver Jeep

His mileage dropped from 19 highway down to 14-15 MPG. Ride quality dropped, handling got worse, braking got worse, suspension wear increased, he does not use it off road, and performance decreased. But it looks cool.

__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JRMichler For This Useful Post:
elhigh (08-18-2017), MetroMPG (08-18-2017)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-18-2017, 01:41 PM   #2 (permalink)
Got MPG?
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Southern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 330

The Car - '09 Toyota Corolla CE Enhanced
Thanks: 13
Thanked 43 Times in 38 Posts
No matter how high you lift...still drags the diffs and axles in the mud, rocks and air apparently.

I never understood this practice.
__________________
2013 Honda Civic Si - 2.4L
OEM front to back belly pan from the factory.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2017, 01:44 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeanBurn View Post
No matter how high you lift...still drags the diffs and axles in the mud, rocks and air apparently.

I never understood this practice.
Lifting still helps.

Axles are movable. Articulated. The body isn't. Lifting it means less chance of getting high-centered on some random obstacle.

But it's a terrible idea for a road-going vehicle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2017, 02:16 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 40.02 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 49.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMichler View Post
But it looks cool.
And that excuses everything.

Since it's his truck it's his choice of course, but it's another example of how people - myself included - can do dumb things in the name of vanity, and then pay for them. In Tracy's case, every time he rolls up at the pumps.

In his defense, Tracy is an avid Jeep guy and wrenches even the apparently rotten corpses of dead ones back to life and goes offroading with them. Putting extra headroom under a Jeep is kind of what everyone expects of him.

Now, however, since we're talking about his DD, is asking whether he will put it back the way it was, and apply those offroading bits to a dedicated offroader instead.
__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.

Last edited by elhigh; 08-18-2017 at 02:28 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2017, 02:22 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
vskid3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 975

Civic DX (sold) - '97 Honda Civic DX
90 day: 34.15 mpg (US)

GTO (sold) - '04 Pontiac GTO
90 day: 22.62 mpg (US)

Green Brick (sold) - '06 Ford Escape Hybrid
90 day: 31.93 mpg (US)
Thanks: 193
Thanked 312 Times in 221 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by niky View Post
Lifting still helps.

Axles are movable. Articulated. The body isn't. Lifting it means less chance of getting high-centered on some random obstacle.

But it's a terrible idea for a road-going vehicle.
It also allows you to use taller tires, which gets the axles higher. Lifting can make a lot of sense for offroading, but like the article says, there are consequences that make it terrible to daily drive.
__________________


Camry Thread
E-Bike Thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2017, 09:47 PM   #6 (permalink)
s_t
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 26
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
And really, it doesn't look any better either

I understand the need/desire in the right circumstances - my Subaru Forester has a 2" strut top lift, which transforms it from being borderline in soft sand, to being able to easily drive around Fraser Island and other similar off-road locations.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2017, 11:00 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeanBurn View Post
No matter how high you lift...still drags the diffs and axles in the mud, rocks and air apparently.

I never understood this practice.
It's pretty simple, you fit bigger tyres to make room under the axles. You lift the body/ suspension to make room for the bigger tyres.


It's worth keeping in mind the usual caveat of not putting too much stock into the MPG claims of the non-hypermiler.

I have a TJ that runs the same engine/ drive train. I did the same basic swap from 225's to 31" tyres and I'm running ~15% over EPA. Brakes are fine although the stock parts only lasted around 20K miles. It will still pretty much pull there rear tyres off the ground in an emergency stop. You need to use more pedal pressure, that doesn't mean the brakes are poor, if you can still lock your wheels on coarse chip, you're fine.

I get the same 18+ MPG he did stock, but with a much less aerodynamic vehicle. Mine is for off road use only.

The gearing thing is also non-sense, you only loose acceleration in first and top gears, there are a stack of gears in between (yes there's added inertia but the 4.0 should be grunty enough for most everyone). In my six speed, first is still very low and top basically idles along at 30mph.

I'm guessing his is an auto and the higher rollout is causing more slippage at lower speeds and possibly not engaging the TC lock as much. Of course you don't buy an auto for MPG.

You can feel the bigger tyres beneath you, but a lot of that I put down to the front and rear live axles. You'll never get 'car like' ride and handling from a live front axle.

My next tyres will be at least 32's or possibly 33's.
__________________







Last edited by oldtamiyaphile; 08-18-2017 at 11:15 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2017, 07:19 AM   #8 (permalink)
Furry Furfag
 
Baltothewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 2,084

Winsight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Miaderp - '95 Mazda Miata
90 day: 28.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 409 Times in 313 Posts
I'll be lifting my 4Runner 2 inches sooner or later (when I have 1000$)with an old man emu kit. I'll report mpg numbers after. I have the 3.sl0, so I'm only getting like 17 anyway right now.

Lmfao. So I just read the article. What a joke. Of COURSE he lost mileage, he went to 31" TIRES. The lift had nothing to do with the MPG drop, going to massive 31" tires did.
__________________


Last edited by Baltothewolf; 08-19-2017 at 08:43 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2017, 10:12 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,005

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 42.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,866
Thanked 2,501 Times in 1,547 Posts
I'm sure the lift didn't help - it increases frontal area. I know it's not apples to oranges, but driving around with the hatch wide open in my Insight causes my mileage to drop by half at 50mph.

Seems to me that stock ride height is probably ideal in most cases. Going the other way presents its own challenges.




Been there with my last car. Scrape scrape scrape, and good luck taking a drink in the car without a lid.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
elhigh (08-19-2017), MetroMPG (08-21-2017)
Old 08-19-2017, 10:21 AM   #10 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 40.02 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 49.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecky View Post
I'm sure the lift didn't help - it increases frontal area. I know it's not apples to oranges, but driving around with the hatch wide open in my Insight causes my mileage to drop by half at 50mph.

Seems to me that stock ride height is probably ideal in most cases. Going the other way presents its own challenges.




Been there with my last car. Scrape scrape scrape, and good luck taking a drink in the car without a lid.
You get less aero drag, but actual DRAG drag becomes an issue...

__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to elhigh For This Useful Post:
Daschicken (08-20-2017), MetroMPG (08-21-2017), roosterk0031 (08-19-2017)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com