Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Off-Topic > The Lounge
Register Now
 Register Now
 


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-26-2014, 05:35 AM   #1 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,217
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
Google gives up on renewables

This article talks about two Google PhDs that spent four years analyzing different renewable energy sources and determined that none of them were viable:

Quote:
At the start of RE<C, we had shared the attitude of many stalwart environmentalists: We felt that with steady improvements to today’s renewable energy technologies, our society could stave off catastrophic climate change. We now know that to be a false hope ...

Renewable energy technologies simply won’t work; we need a fundamentally different approach.
Renewable energy 'simply WON'T WORK': Top Google engineers

On page 2:
Quote:
What’s needed are zero-carbon energy sources so cheap that the operators of power plants and industrial facilities alike have an economic rationale for switching over within the next 40 years ...

Incremental improvements to existing technologies aren't enough; we need something truly disruptive.
The author writes that the PhDs do not know what will work, but explains that nuclear power will, and states that a grand total of fifty-six people have died in nuclear accidents, which is less than any other energy technology, including renewables.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-26-2014, 07:20 AM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
As far as the UK is concerned, practice appears to be proving them wrong.

Quote:
RenewableUK says a record high of 22% of the UKs electricity was generated by wind on Sunday 17th August,

22% is the highest proportion of the UKs electricity needs ever generated from wind over a 24-hour period (5,797MW average over the 24-hour period on Sunday 17th Aug).

The highest ever average amount of electricity generated from wind over a 24-hour period stands at 7,234MW - a record set on 3rd January 2014.
RenewableUK | RenewableUK News - New record high: 22% of UK electricity from wind

That's only electricity generation and also the best rather than average 24 hour period but the technology keeps developing and costs keep reducing.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Nigel_S For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (11-28-2014)
Old 11-26-2014, 08:57 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
P-hack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,408

awesomer - '04 Toyota prius
Thanks: 102
Thanked 252 Times in 204 Posts
Looking at one location doesn't really prove them wrong. And the UK is hardly running all electric now is it? Plus a lot of homes use non-electric to heat, so you need the infrastructure to run ALL the cars and heat/cool ALL the homes and businesses, and it needs to cover varying degrees of population density over large areas. Plus you need renewable for everything else, i.e. stuff from the store.

"Even if one were to electrify all of transport, industry, heating and so on, so much renewable generation and balancing/storage equipment would be needed to power it that astronomical new requirements for steel, concrete, copper, glass, carbon fibre, neodymium, shipping and haulage etc etc would appear. All these things are made using mammoth amounts of energy: far from achieving massive energy savings, which most plans for a renewables future rely on implicitly, we would wind up needing far more energy, which would mean even more vast renewables farms - and even more materials and energy to make and maintain them and so on. The scale of the building would be like nothing ever attempted by the human race.

In reality, well before any such stage was reached, energy would become horrifyingly expensive - "

It seems like it would be a lot cheaper to simply have the places affected move to slightly higher ground to me.

Last edited by P-hack; 11-26-2014 at 09:03 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2014, 09:51 AM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by P-hack View Post
Looking at one location doesn't really prove them wrong. And the UK is hardly running all electric now is it? Plus a lot of homes use non-electric to heat, so you need the infrastructure to run ALL the cars and heat/cool ALL the homes and businesses, and it needs to cover varying degrees of population density over large areas. Plus you need renewable for everything else, i.e. stuff from the store.
At one time the UK ran on steam power using coal for everything, the change to diesel required completely new infrastructure but was remarkably quick when it suddenly became both feasible and cost effective. We are not far from seeing the same happening with wind power. Electricity is one of the easiest power sources to transport and to install the necessary infrastructure, we already have a system in place, just need to increase the capacity and with the latest generation of wind turbines generating twice the power of two years ago we don't even need to double the current number to achieve 100% of current consumption on windy days and by then electricity from wind will be cheaper than that from coal.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2014, 09:56 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
P-hack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,408

awesomer - '04 Toyota prius
Thanks: 102
Thanked 252 Times in 204 Posts
yup, that doesn't scale very well. You live on a relatively small island next to a lot of wind (for now). If wind patterns change you will be out of luck.



It should come as no surprise that migratory birds take advantage of wind patterns too.

Last edited by P-hack; 11-26-2014 at 10:18 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2014, 10:43 AM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by P-hack View Post
yup, that doesn't scale very well. You live on a relatively small island next to a lot of wind (for now). If wind patterns change you will be out of luck.
Not sure what living on a small island, part falling off the edge of the world at zero degrees has got to do with it, apart from that it is a little more cost effective for us than others. Maybe some of the others would like to import some from us, just as we currently import gas and coal from Australia. Although the even smaller island of Anglesey has been a net exporter of wind generated electricity for about 15 years now so maybe size does matter.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2014, 11:16 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
P-hack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,408

awesomer - '04 Toyota prius
Thanks: 102
Thanked 252 Times in 204 Posts
re: Anglesey, geographic size isn't really deterministic, it is the consumption, which is more closely related to the population size.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2014, 11:19 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '11 Honda CBR250R
90 day: 105.14 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Honda Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Honda Fit Auto
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

PCX153 - '13 Honda PCX150
90 day: 104.48 mpg (US)

2015 Yamaha R3 - '15 Yamaha R3
90 day: 80.94 mpg (US)

Ninja650 - '19 Kawasaki Ninja 650
90 day: 72.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
Basically the report says no matter what we do, when the fossil fuel runs out, civilzation will collapse in a series of starvation and pandemics.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2014, 11:52 AM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by P-hack View Post
re: Anglesey, geographic size isn't really deterministic, it is the consumption, which is more closely related to the population size.
Not sure what you mean, it has a population density of 253/sq mi compared to the USA having 88.6/sq mi so it should be a lot easier for the USA to generate enough power from the available wind...
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Nigel_S For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (11-28-2014)
Old 11-26-2014, 11:59 AM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
P-hack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,408

awesomer - '04 Toyota prius
Thanks: 102
Thanked 252 Times in 204 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sendler View Post
Basically the report says no matter what we do, when the fossil fuel runs out, civilzation will collapse in a series of starvation and pandemics.
AKA population bubble self correction.

In case you are in denial:
http://dailyreckoning.com/human-popu...n-to-the-mean/


Last edited by P-hack; 11-26-2014 at 12:06 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to P-hack For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (11-26-2014)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com