Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-21-2010, 05:17 PM   #51 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 196
Thanks: 4
Thanked 34 Times in 26 Posts
If you don't have some form of MPGe, how do you decide when it makes ecological sense to switch from diesel/gas to some kind of electric?

Finest regards,

troy

__________________
2004 VW TDI PD on bio

want to build 150 mpg diesel streamliner.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-21-2010, 05:18 PM   #52 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JasonG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charlotte NC / York SC
Posts: 728

05 DMax - '05 Chevrolet 2500HD
90 day: 18.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 120
Thanked 56 Times in 52 Posts
It's sort of like the * next to Barry Bonds homerun record.
Sure he beat Hank Aaron, but the * will always invalidate it.

Nissan Leaf 227 MPG *
__________________



I can't understand why my MPG's are so low..........
21,000lb, 41' Toy Haulers are rough on FE!
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2010, 06:04 PM   #53 (permalink)
EtOH
 
Allch Chcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Coast, California
Posts: 429

Cordelia - '15 Mazda Mazda3 i Sport
90 day: 37.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcb View Post
the xprize MPGe is crap
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcb View Post
I never agreed to it
Your opinion is wrong.

The Lower/Higher Heating Value per gallon of fuel is a proven and commonly accepted number.

So you're just trolling.

Ethanol beat Gasoline nyah nyah
__________________
-Allch Chcar

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2010, 07:51 PM   #54 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
IamIan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 692
Thanks: 371
Thanked 227 Times in 140 Posts
Just figured I'd throw my 2 bits in... some of which has been touched on a bit in some previous posts.

skip it ... or get comfy.


- - - - - - - - -

MPGe.

The way I see it there are 3 main methods ... each of which has 3 sub-methods.

The 3 main methods are:

#1> Vehicle level comparison ( Pump or outlet to wheels )

#2> Complete cycle ( From raw source materials and initial energy sources to material disposal )

#3> Partial cycle ( include more than the pump / outlet , but don't include the whole cycle )


Each of which has 3 sub-methods:

#A> $ Cost comparison

#B> Energy comparison

#C> Environmental Impact comparison

- - - - - - - - - - -

This gives us at least 9 distinct methods of determining MPGe ... and virtually unlimited methods to mix and match different scales of each if we try and combine them.

- - - - - - - - - - -

My personal preferences in order:
#1> Energy comparison
#2> Environmental Impact comparison
#3> Cost Comparison

My personal preferences of main types in order:
#1> Complete cycle
#2> Vehicle level
#3> Partial cycle

- - - - - - - - - - - -

My 2 bits Complete cycle Energy comparison:

For any 'complete' cycle ... My first question is about the initial energy source for the fuel.

Fossil fuels are just a very inefficient method of converting solar energy ... Photosynthesis is less efficient than modern day photovoltaic ... and only a tiny tiny fraction of that energy ends up being converted into fossil fuels ... which then need to be extracted % loss ... transported % loss ... refined % loss ... before they are used in a ICE that is almost never even as high as ~50% efficient.

Compared to converting that same initial solar energy source into electrical energy ... transporting it ... battery cycle ... modern efficient electronics ... modern efficient electric motors ... the RE powered BEV beats the crap out of any fossil fuel option ... I would estimate well over ~300 to 1 advantage for the RE powered BEV.

But with enough data a specific vehicle could be calculated.

- - - - - - - - - - -

My 2 bits Vehicle level Energy comparison:

Given the average ICE efficiency of ~30% ... with peaks as high as ~50% ... and lows as low in the single digits %.

Given the much higher ~90%+ Efficiency of modern electric drive systems ... and given the much much broader range of higher operating efficiency ... efficiency less effected by cold ... by load ... etc.

This makes the BEV about ~300% more energy efficient compared to the ICE , at the vehicle level... or for a given amount of energy , the BEV I would generally expect to travel about ~3x as far.

BEVs that end up weighing more will have more rolling resistance ... which is linearly related to weight ... so in order to counter the ~300% vehicle level energy efficiency ... the BEV weight would have to increase by close to ~300% ... which even lead sleds don't get that much heavier.

Of course individual vehicles can be measured ... by the energy content of the fuel they use compared to the average distance they travel with that amount of fuel energy... the low efficiency of ICEs pretty much destroys them in this type of comparison.

- - - - - - - - - -

Although partial cycles are not a preference of mine ... I do recognize allot of people usually ignore all the losses it took to produce the fossil fuel in the first place.

Even on that level I would suspect a BEV would still come out ahead on a energy efficiency basis.

Short version:
I suspect : A Gasoline fueled power plant would most likely move BEVs ... further per gallon consumed ... than multiple ICE fueled vehicles with the same amount of gasoline.

The massive variation of ICE efficiencies is a killer to that platform ... a stationary centrally located power plant no longer has to worry much about size ... or weight ... a 0.1% efficiency improvement that costs 2 tons of equipment , is usually worth doing.

This means that the more efficient centrally located power generation system will be likely to operate at close to double the energy efficiency of the mobile ICE that has so many other compromises due to weight , size, efficiency fluctuations , etc.... if a co-generation plant ... it might be as high as 3x as efficient.

I suspect , losses in electrical transportation are less per unit energy than the losses of gasoline transportation ... meaning the trucks that drive the gasoline around the country from the refineries ... are far less efficient than the electrical grid... per mile / per unit of energy.

In short ... there are very good reasons we do not run generators at each of our homes ... and have them all powered by gasoline deliveries ... the same is true for why a more efficient centrally located power plant would make better use of the same fuel.

The added bonus ... is that the centrally located power plant , would not need as much refining losses of the initial fossil fuel.

with enough data this could also be calculated for a specific vehicle , and power plant.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2010, 09:50 PM   #55 (permalink)
EtOH
 
Allch Chcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Coast, California
Posts: 429

Cordelia - '15 Mazda Mazda3 i Sport
90 day: 37.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonG
So if we are comparing BTUs, do we add a 1.89 correction factor for alcohol?

An active person outputs 1000-1300 BTUs/hr, so is there a MPGe for HPVs ?

Comparisons can be a slippery slope.
While we are on the topic of slippery slopes, holy crudman of strawmen. Do you even understand what BTUs are or how they relate to MPG?

The correction factor is to compare KW-H using MPG as a guide. If you divide the Lower heating value (in KW-H) of Gasoline by the MPGe you can get the KW-H per mile. It's only to properly gauge everything else against Gasoline, notably Electric Vehicles. Methanol would get a 2.05 correction factor on this scale! We're comparing energy efficiency here not range per gallon. Don't get the two confused here.

And to answer your second question the answer is yes, but what you are referring to is just the waste heat generated not the energy consumption. But it involves converting calories into KW-H.
__________________
-Allch Chcar

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2010, 06:18 AM   #56 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
IamIan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 692
Thanks: 371
Thanked 227 Times in 140 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allch Chcar View Post
And to answer your second question the answer is yes, but what you are referring to is just the waste heat generated not the energy consumption. But it involves converting calories into KW-H.
1 food calorie = 1 ,000 normal calories
1 food calorie = ~0.001163 kW·h
~2,000 food calorie a day diet = ~2.326 kwh / day ( consumed )
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2010, 06:29 AM   #57 (permalink)
dcb
needs more cowbell
 
dcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,038

pimp mobile - '81 suzuki gs 250 t
90 day: 96.29 mpg (US)

schnitzel - '01 Volkswagen Golf TDI
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allch Chcar View Post
...It's only to properly gauge everything else against Gasoline
How is it "proper" to stack the deck for electricity? Or stay in the mental trappings of mpg and gasoline?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Allch Chcar View Post
..We're comparing energy efficiency here not range per gallon.
Not exactly. Range is part of the calculation and there is little contention there. main issues are:

1. Information is lost in the conversion to the "dumbed down" mpge figure.
you cannot discern the distinct fuel and electric contributions. This could have major effects on your cost per mile assumptions, or your expected environmental impact based on location specific factors and fuel preferences.

2. MPG was a horrible metric. Mass gives a consistent energy content for a given fuel (what planes use), gallons (volume) does not, we should kill mpg while we can.

3. and not least by any measure, Electricity has undergone it's major heat losses at the plant. It has well to walls efficiency of ~%30, where gasoline (possibly better for other liquid fuels like biodiesel) is considered ~%83 efficient. But electricity has not undergone the major carnot cycle transformations, so the deck is stacked for electricity in MPGe. If I take my "%41" efficient tdi, times %83, I get %34 efficiency out of my engine, whereas a %90 efficient electric motor (if it was plugged directly into the wall) would only be %27 efficient. This appears to be a fundamental flaw in the GREET model, there is not a good way to compare electricity (which has already undergone it's major heat loss conversion) to liquid (or gaseous or solid) fuels without looking at the full lifecyle.
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!

Last edited by dcb; 12-22-2010 at 06:36 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2010, 08:03 AM   #58 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JasonG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charlotte NC / York SC
Posts: 728

05 DMax - '05 Chevrolet 2500HD
90 day: 18.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 120
Thanked 56 Times in 52 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allch Chcar View Post
While we are on the topic of slippery slopes, holy crudman of strawmen. Do you even understand what BTUs are or how they relate to MPG?

The correction factor is to compare KW-H using MPG as a guide. If you divide the Lower heating value (in KW-H) of Gasoline by the MPGe you can get the KW-H per mile. It's only to properly gauge everything else against Gasoline, notably Electric Vehicles. Methanol would get a 2.05 correction factor on this scale! We're comparing energy efficiency here not range per gallon. Don't get the two confused here.

And to answer your second question the answer is yes, but what you are referring to is just the waste heat generated not the energy consumption. But it involves converting calories into KW-H.
Thans Allch Char. My math was off. I meant 2.05 it seems.

I agree with you that E rules. Properly made it beats dino fuel by a landslide. The bad part is in this comparison it cuts your MPG by half. But we're still comparing gallons.
__________________



I can't understand why my MPG's are so low..........
21,000lb, 41' Toy Haulers are rough on FE!
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2010, 08:06 AM   #59 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
The X-Prize spreadsheet does fully account for the BTU content of E10, and E85 (that the winning Edison2 car used), and for diesel, and for hybrids, and for electricity.

How does counting all the BTU's in each form of energy carried onboard the vehicle, give an advantage to any one of them?

For what it is worth, many folks on the Electric Vehicle Discussion List (email listserve) feel that the X-Prize emissions rules were biased against electric vehicles; because they have to account for the embedded energy; while none of the liquid fuels had to add this.

It also helps to have ~85% efficiency (TW4XP) in the car vs 34% (for the VLC).
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2010, 08:16 AM   #60 (permalink)
Engineering first
 
bwilson4web's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 843

17 i3-REx - '14 BMW i3-REx
Last 3: 45.67 mpg (US)

Blue Bob's - '19 Tesla Std Rng Plus
Thanks: 94
Thanked 246 Times in 157 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertSmalls View Post
...and why EVs alone are of doubtful environmental benefit.

As more of us, myself included, are transitioning to plug-in vehicles of some type or another, the controversial topic of mpge is being discussed with increasing frequency. . . .
I don't have a 'dog in that fight,' the value of MPGe, but I do have an interest in PHEV in no small part because our 1.5L engine 2003 and 1.8L engine 2010 Prius are getting nearly the same MPG with 10 years of technical advances between them. Also, there was a King County Washington report after a year of NHW20, PHEV Prius operation that saw rather modest MPG improvement in their fleet MPG.

I think PHEV can improve Prius performance if the control laws maximize the remaining, inefficient regions. This is different from trying to come up with an MPGe figure because it presumes a different application of the extra energy. But to test this hypothesis, I have to make a PHEV, in my case, our 2003, NHW11.

Bob Wilson

__________________
2019 Tesla Model 3 Std. Range Plus - 215 mi EV
2017 BMW i3-REx - 106 mi EV, 88 mi mid-grade
Retired engineer, Huntsville, AL
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New personal record: 632 miles on 1 tank. 48 MPG in my Auomatic 05 Corolla blackjackel Success Stories 6 11-30-2009 01:02 PM
About 4 miles per gallon RandomFact314 Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 21 08-30-2009 05:24 PM
Various transportation methods, how many gallons to go 350 miles Daox General Efficiency Discussion 27 04-06-2009 01:56 AM
Why SUV fuel economy is so much more important than small car fuel economy... SVOboy General Efficiency Discussion 30 02-23-2009 06:26 PM
What's your best bet for an automatic? Crono EcoModding Central 16 10-22-2008 01:14 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com