Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-06-2016, 09:37 PM   #31 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 115
Thanks: 4
Thanked 45 Times in 25 Posts
IIWIYS - I would put the 400 crank into the 350, and build a 383 stroker (that may be bored .030).

That engine is a torque monster.

Then run a numerically low rear end with the O/D trans of your choice, and you will always be in the sweet spot - torque-wise.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-07-2016, 07:36 AM   #32 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 829
Thanks: 44
Thanked 104 Times in 80 Posts
It seems to me that the primary advantage of a FI engine is the tight controls on A/F ratio. What if you had a setup where you could dial in the A/F ratio on the fly as you can with carbed aircraft engines? Am I correct in assuming you can get away with some pretty lean numbers so long as you are puttering around in a low load situation and heat only becomes an issue under higher loads? If this is so, have a setup where he could drive around, very lean and if he wanted to call down to the engine room for more power, all he's have to do is give it a quick turn of a dash mounted knob? I suppose this has already been recommended by someone who said us a 4bbl with the primaries set lean and the secondaries rich. Maybe a combination of the two would be good, as I could see a situation, such as running down the hiway, where you are at a pretty decent sustained load, but not quite into the secondaries yet. In such a case, you would have the abilities to richen the primaries.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2016, 01:06 PM   #33 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
gumby79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Butte, Montana
Posts: 725

little jona - '91 Dodge D 250 first gen cummins LE
Team Streamliner
90 day: 23.4 mpg (US)

Little Jona airo modded - '91 Dodge RAM 3/4 TON D 250 2×4 AUTO
Pickups
Team Cummins
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

The Salted Hound Jenny. - '87 Dodge Ram 50/D-50 5sp 4X4
90 day: 20.24 mpg (US)

Jona Allison aero - '91 Dodge Ram D-250 Le
90 day: 20.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 208
Thanked 427 Times in 278 Posts
Drive it like you could fly it

12-Channel Digital EGT and/or CHT Pyrometer Gauge Display
This is a major investment @ 375usd +probs



The above Aviation style driving can be achieved with this gage were every cylinder has an alarm. High and low .if one gose wonky the gage can turn on a water /meth injector for that cylinder or the hole motor like a NOS FOG HAT or NOS RUNNER INJECTION ,but water/and or methanol
Sounds like this will be a custom Radio Flyer purpose bult to showcase your engine building skills , a SEMA. TRUCK. And moving non car worthy stuff.
In witch cace this artical will sted some light on how you can use the gage for tuning ,and it has a +-5%accuracy (1000°C or F on gage=950-1050°actual .
The extra probes can be used for other stuff like coolent,diff, trans,intake air . as the device will read and display all the way down past ambant (-148°)

MPG-4 Featured in Fast 20Car Magazine Issue 20332 July 20 2013 .pdf

---
Aerohead this is the gage for your streemliner nabor that we were talking about with the melted pistons.
---
They also have a 4 cylinder version for our 4banger brothers .
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	MPG-12_Multi%20Channel%20Digital%20Pyrometer%20Gauge_Front%20Profile_Backlit.jpg
Views:	28
Size:	131.4 KB
ID:	21016  
__________________
1st gen cummins 91.5 dodge d250 ,HX35W/12/6 QSV
ehxsost manafulld wrap, Aero Tonto
best tank: distance 649gps mi 24.04 mpg 27.011usg
Best mpg : 31.32mpg 100mi 3.193 USG 5/2/20


Former
'83 GMC S-15 Jimmy 2door 2wd O/D auto 3.73R&P
'79 Chevy K20 4X4 350ci 400hp msd custom th400 /np205. 7.5-new 14mpg modded befor modding was a thing
87' Hyundai Excel
83 ranger w/87 2.9 L FI2wd auto 18mpg on the floor
04 Mitsubishi Gallant 2.4L auto 26mpg
06 Subaru Forrester XT(WRX PACKAGE) MT AWD Turbocharged 18 plying dirty best of 26mpg@70mph
95Chevy Blazer 4x4 auto 14-18mpg
04 Chevy Blazer 4x4 auto 16-22mpg


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gumby79 For This Useful Post:
RustyLugNut (12-07-2016)
Old 12-07-2016, 01:29 PM   #34 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: london, on
Posts: 340

Buggie - '01 Vw Beetle TDI Gls
Thanks: 4
Thanked 33 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beau View Post
IIWIYS - I would put the 400 crank into the 350, and build a 383 stroker (that may be bored .030).

That engine is a torque monster.

Then run a numerically low rear end with the O/D trans of your choice, and you will always be in the sweet spot - torque-wise.
I never understood this. Ruin a 400, loose 20 cubic inches, and pay for a crap load of work, for what? The 400 would have the same torque, if not more because of the larger size.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2016, 01:41 PM   #35 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
gumby79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Butte, Montana
Posts: 725

little jona - '91 Dodge D 250 first gen cummins LE
Team Streamliner
90 day: 23.4 mpg (US)

Little Jona airo modded - '91 Dodge RAM 3/4 TON D 250 2×4 AUTO
Pickups
Team Cummins
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

The Salted Hound Jenny. - '87 Dodge Ram 50/D-50 5sp 4X4
90 day: 20.24 mpg (US)

Jona Allison aero - '91 Dodge Ram D-250 Le
90 day: 20.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 208
Thanked 427 Times in 278 Posts
1)Reduced rotating mass 4.0"Vs4.125"bore =faster rev and higher topend 2)closer to square piston/ stroke ratio
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2016, 03:05 PM   #36 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 115
Thanks: 4
Thanked 45 Times in 25 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bandit86 View Post
I never understood this. Ruin a 400, loose 20 cubic inches, and pay for a crap load of work, for what? The 400 would have the same torque, if not more because of the larger size.
You might want to look into it further. I believe you may find things are different than you have described, on several fronts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2016, 11:01 AM   #37 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Knoxville TN.
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Did a comparison last night between the 267 and the 283 w/ 601 305 heads, using the same camshaft and equal Dynamic Compression. The 267 best the 283 by 1/2 mpg but the 283 had 60 more HP at 5500. 😕 The 283 had a lot less horsepower loss than the 267 did.
Where can I find formulas for calculating (approximating) torque at a given rpm using average chamber pressure ???
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2016, 11:13 AM   #38 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Knoxville TN.
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Would members be interested in seeing the way I modify Holley Booster for better fuel atomization and low flow performance ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2016, 11:46 AM   #39 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 72

silverado30mpg - '90 Chevrolet Silverado 2WD w/ 3.08 gear
90 day: 18.91 mpg (US)

BuzzBuzz - '91 Suzuki Swift GT
90 day: 159.12 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
I'd be interested in seeing that modification. I have buddies who still run carbs.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2016, 09:00 PM   #40 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: london, on
Posts: 340

Buggie - '01 Vw Beetle TDI Gls
Thanks: 4
Thanked 33 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by gumby79 View Post
1)Reduced rotating mass 4.0"Vs4.125"bore =faster rev and higher topend 2)closer to square piston/ stroke ratio
How much weight is .125 larger bore going to add? And over share will make it rev faster, but all things being equal, 20 more cubic inches add 5%more power

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beau View Post
You might want to look into it further. I believe you may find things are different than you have described, on several fronts.
Seriously? Same crank. Wider bore. There is a common knowledge, the claim that having something one off is better, the misconception that everybody knows, that a 383 is a torque monster. Having the same stroke as a 400, all things are similar if you were to install (if possible) smaller cylinders. A bigger bore makes more torque because you have a larger piston area, therefore the same psi pushing down has a larger area to push down on.

Kinda why all old hoteods have/ had 350 Chevys. Everybody thinks its the coolest. So take one, make it bigger, into a 383. Still a boring SBC.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com