Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register
Now


View Poll Results: Did you pick up any new tips from the list?
Yes 88 96.70%
No 3 3.30%
Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-08-2008, 12:49 AM   #41 (permalink)
ECO-Evolution
 
Lazarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,186

Days of Yore - '98 E-Bike
90 day: 4979.53 mpg (US)
Some of the comments are pretty funny on the diggs page.

Quote:
I just read through the whole damn thing, and every bit of it was more painful than the last. These people are lunatics. Basically everything they offer would save a completely negligible amount of fuel, except for those rediculous "tactics" that excacerbate the traffic problem and prevent normal people from driving like normal people. I mean, looking for roads shielded from the wind? These people aren't in fifth grade anymore, surely they must realize that just because something "theoretically" works doesn't make it in the least bit practical. And they basically missed two crucial factors: an efficient car (not a hybrid) and a manual transimission.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________




No I believe you, just show me a source please
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 08:36 AM   #42 (permalink)
MPG Centurion
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by guitarterry View Post
I cant even figure out what timing your exit is talking about. Sounds like your talking about leaving the parking lot, not parking. It does sound good though. Make sure your lane is empty before you exit your parking spot.
Easiest to give an example. There is a restaurant I frequent in a large mall parking lot. There is an exit in a section of the parking lot that is always empty. After I eat and I want to leave, head towards that section of parking lot. One well timed pulse can get me down the hill and out of the parking lot and too the light around the corner. Sometimes when I make it down the hill to the exit the traffic is such that I don't have to perform one orbit in order to let traffic clear so I can make my exit.

In that case orbit is good. If I'm lucky I don't have to orbit and I can take the exit, go to the light and make the corner (if green). If I'm not lucky I have to orbit waiting for traffic to clear at the end of the hill so I can exit. The exit is blind so I never know till I'm at the bottom of the hill if there is traffic or not. Orbit is the only answer.

Now I will concede that orbit on the way into a parking lot is a numbers game. But on the way out, it can make sense.

11011011
__________________
Houston Hybrid and Hypermilers Club <106mpg.com>

Best commute = 14.3mi @ 114 MPG (sg2)
Best (non-trivial) tank = 759mi @ 80.7 MPG (fcd)
MPG Centurion-Hybridfest 2007-Prius II-26mi @ 106 MPG (sg2)
Dan <11011011>
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 05:10 PM   #43 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 24
A friend of mine broke his ankle years ago and it has never been right. The result is that his foot is not steady on the gas but rather goes in/out giving a somewhat jerky ride. It drives me crazy and his driving is not particularly economically oriented. BUT-
He is able to get very good mileage from some large cars/trucks. For some reason maybe this creates a (mini) 'Pulse and Glide' scenario?? Is this possible that this is the key to improved mileage??
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 11:07 AM   #44 (permalink)
02 Golf TDI Driver
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Scott, La
Posts: 875

The Golf - '02 Golf GLS TDI
90 day: 54.79 mpg (US)

Mongoose - '05 E-bike AWD
90 day: 1810.34 mpg (US)
Send a message via AIM to dremd
Quote:
Originally Posted by njlou View Post
A friend of mine broke his ankle years ago and it has never been right. The result is that his foot is not steady on the gas but rather goes in/out giving a somewhat jerky ride. It drives me crazy and his driving is not particularly economically oriented. BUT-
He is able to get very good mileage from some large cars/trucks. For some reason maybe this creates a (mini) 'Pulse and Glide' scenario?? Is this possible that this is the key to improved mileage??
That's how my dad has always driven, drives me nuts, still.

His may be smaller pulses than my dad, his are to the point that an automatic is downshifting at the end of the pulse.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 09:23 AM   #45 (permalink)
MPG Centurion
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 14
Printable Version

I wrote this up for my Saturday Hybrid Club meet.

http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dxc3879_13g2mmd5cx

The page formatting is a bit off on the google docs, the PDF is a bit better.

Rats... can't attach it... Too big.

11011011
__________________
Houston Hybrid and Hypermilers Club <106mpg.com>

Best commute = 14.3mi @ 114 MPG (sg2)
Best (non-trivial) tank = 759mi @ 80.7 MPG (fcd)
MPG Centurion-Hybridfest 2007-Prius II-26mi @ 106 MPG (sg2)
Dan <11011011>
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 09:47 AM   #46 (permalink)
Captain Slow
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,018

Blackfly - '98 Metro
90 day: 78.69 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 128.28 mpg (US)
Thanks for posting that, Dan. I'm glad you were able to make use of it for your group.

Schultz - I think it's what you were after to print out for work?

There's more to be done to the tips list (including adding 3 more tips today - 2 of yours, Dan). The ultimate goal is to have a printer-friendly version that's linked to the table which stores the tips so it's always current.
__________________
Latest test: Minivan Kardboard Kammback boosts MPG +3.7% (6.6%, counting roof rack delete)

Latest mod project: designing/building front wheel skirts (Geo Metro)





www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 04:23 PM   #47 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1
Two tips and a question

My dad used to "drive straight" He would pick a point in the distance then drive to it. Kept down the amount of wandering in his lane he did. Cut down the mileage from the wandering too.

Myself, I have found the least practiced maintenance on a vehicle is on your transmission. By getting a transmission flush (not a transmission filter replacement) on an older pickup, I got 2.8 mpg better.

My question is: does anyone recommend setting your cruise control and then using foot control to over rule the cruise control in mountain driving?
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 07:19 PM   #48 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lafayette, cO
Posts: 3
top 10 for newbies

Hi all - first post. I've been lurking on and off since an article on Hypermiling ran in Mother Jones last year (?).

I loved the list. One thing I thought was missing was making sure you don't use snow tires when you don't need them. Out here in Colorado the memory of "that one storm when I slipped" probably costs as much in gas as... I don't know... as all the extra roof racks?

Anyway. I consider myself more of a newbie than a hypermiler. My top 10:
- Keep a driving journal. For at least a couple weeks record the starting and ending odometer of every trip you take.
- Take opportunities to avoid driving. Schedule your errand driving days. Call a friend for a ride or offer a ride.
- Drive less than the speed limit.
- Adopt a mantra that helps you drive slower. Mine is "no need to speed."
- Drive with the windows up when you're at 45+ mph.
- Drive a 90% car. People tend to shop for a car they can do 100% of their driving in, so they're driving a "get to the mountains in heavy snow with entertainment for the kids" and "Take the bikes and haul the boat to the reservoir" car for their commute and errands.
- Compute your commute. The Federal reimbursement rate for business driving is $.50/mile. If you apply that to your commute, how much is it costing?
- Pretend your car is in the shop for a week. Maybe drop it off at a friendly shop and tell them you're out of town. Watch your creativity bloom.
- Skip the lights. When you have a choice of routes, take the one with the fewest stoplights.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 07:35 PM   #49 (permalink)
Contumacious Rapscallion
 
metroschultz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Virginia Beach, Va. USA
Posts: 618

SuperElasticBubblePlastic - '93 Metro plainjane
90 day: 55.06 mpg (US)

SilverHairBeauty - '01 Avalon XL
90 day: 24.06 mpg (US)

I'mL8I'mL8 - '99 Jetta GLS
90 day: 28.74 mpg (US)
Send a message via AIM to metroschultz
Yes that will do nicely guys, thank you.
I must find a way to cut it down though.
I am sure they (The admins) won't let me put 17 pages up on the comunity bulletin board.
I'll have to pick my favorite 25 or so and re-edit (?) the list.
or maybe the 25 I think thes people will actually use.
Or maybe the 25 I used first.
Or maybe I'm thinking this out tooo much.
S.
__________________
I drive a piece 'o' Krap, so remember, "If you can't be handsome at least be handy"(Red Green).Schultz.

!!WooHoo I did it!! (now for the 55 MPG mark)
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 07:55 PM   #50 (permalink)
hypofueler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: ohio
Posts: 2

Chick Magnet - '06 Civic Hybrid
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
I agree that tip amounts to a numbers game, but I think it has educational value.
Actually, gliding to a parking spot that gets you to (1) face out, (2) near the exit and/or (3) parked at higher elevation is often worth it.....
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 12:58 PM   #51 (permalink)
Old Skool h-miler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Summerville, SC
Posts: 4
First, I do some of the things on the list already, but I learned several new tricks to employ. #42 really made me think about my cruise control use. I thought that the cruise control was automatically better than foot driving. I hadn't really considered the hills! Great compilation! I might print it out and keep it in the car.

Quote:
My dad used to "drive straight" He would pick a point in the distance then drive to it. Kept down the amount of wandering in his lane he did. Cut down the mileage from the wandering too.
This reminds of something I do when driving on the Interstate. I often drive a 100 mile Interstate (I26 in SC) run between where I live and Columbia. It is the most boring stretch of pine trees in the world, I think! Anyway, lots of time to think and optimize mileage.

What I call "Straight Driving" is a little different and won't necessarily increase MPG. It will reduce the miles, time on the road and gasoline burned somewhat. How much depends on how curvy the road is. The Interstate is the ideal practice point for this, because it is always =>2 lanes and the curves are burmed, so curves won't be too hard on you. Safety, of course, comes first and you shouldn't 'cut' anyone off or hold up traffic.

What I do is attempt to straighten the curves out by taking the inside lane of curves. This requires some extra lane changes, so be careful and it is a lot easier when there aren't many cars on the road. If you hug the inside of the curve, you are reducing the distance you have to drive, much like the 'racing line' approach to turns.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 01:02 PM   #52 (permalink)
Old Skool h-miler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Summerville, SC
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpartyBrutus View Post
Actually, gliding to a parking spot that gets you to (1) face out, (2) near the exit and/or (3) parked at higher elevation is often worth it.....
Indeed, I park as close the the entrance/exit as possible and walk to the store. I always ask why people love parking close to the store. What are you going to do when you get inside? Walk around!

Heck, when I park in my driveway (why isn't it called a parkway?) I pull in as little as possible, so I have less distance to pull out. 5 feet times 2 times 365 days is 3,650 feet or .7 MILES!
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2008, 04:29 PM   #53 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Taco Bowl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Norcal
Posts: 18

Deleted - '-1899 POS V6
90 day: 16.52 mpg (US)

lifted 4x4 Taco - '01 Tacoma V6
90 day: 17.73 mpg (US)
I know something important that you can add to the list.

Maintenance
Use synthetic oil. Be sure to change ur filters and oil when its due. Seafoaming the engine every now and then will probably help too.

If your oil and filters are dirty then the engine is more stressed. Keeping everything clean will allow the engine to perform more efficiently.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2008, 05:44 PM   #54 (permalink)
ECO-Evolution
 
Lazarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,186

Days of Yore - '98 E-Bike
90 day: 4979.53 mpg (US)
Do you have any data that proves synthetic oil increase FE. I know it extends the interval but I have not seen data using motor oils of equal weights that synthetic oil gives an increase in normal cars gas mileage.
__________________




No I believe you, just show me a source please
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2008, 06:14 PM   #55 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Taco Bowl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Norcal
Posts: 18

Deleted - '-1899 POS V6
90 day: 16.52 mpg (US)

lifted 4x4 Taco - '01 Tacoma V6
90 day: 17.73 mpg (US)
I dont have any official sources. But I got a slight increase in mileage when i switched to synthetics. I know that maintenance will help mpg since it'll keep ur engine at the top of its game.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2008, 11:58 PM   #56 (permalink)
Bicycle Junky
 
NoCO2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 456

Putsaround - '96 Camry LE
90 day: 32.74 mpg (US)

The Commuter - '07 1000SL
90 day: 617.28 mpg (US)
Great list, after reading it, though I knew most of it already, I did pick up a few more details on some tricks I was less familiar with. So far, I've improved 2mpg just by spending 5 minutes reading the tips. The cyclist thing really brought the idea home for me.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2008, 02:03 PM   #57 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Peterborough, Ontario
Posts: 376

Jetta - '05 Jetta
Rebuttal received via e-mail

The following message was sent to you via the EcoModder.com Contact Us form by Ryan
Martinez.
--------------------------------

Re: Your tips.
I was reading some of your tips, and have some feedback on them.
1. Some of them are untrue.
2. Some of them are very unsafe
3. Some of them will cause your car to break down early (I'm a professional mechanic.)

As for the untrue ones. Driving with your lights on does not decrease your fuel
efficiency. On any vehicle the alternator is turning at the same relative speed as
the vehicle's engine. That means that it's going to continue charging the battery
and shunting the excess voltage back into the alternator. Only when you're using a
HECK OF A LOT of power is it going to start using battery voltage to power it all.
And by a heck of a lot I mean neons, a sound system, and a multi-screen DVD display
in the car all running at the same time.
Also, when a vehicle is warm it does have greater efficiency in fuel usage, true,
but at the same time, the warmer the tires, the more they stick, causing a decrease
in mileage. To be honest, Cold Air Intake systems usually increase mileage because
of the cold air, the warmer the air the more of it has to pass through to get the
same effect as a smaller amount of cold air, and the amount of fuel injected depends
on the amount of air passing through. So down to about 30 degrees or so it's
actually more efficient to drive in the cold than the warm.
You also seem to like turning the engine off. While that does save gas to coast it
also takes an approximate fuel/air mixture of 8:1 for a cold engine and a mixture of
10:1 for a warm engine, compared with pedal to the metal acceleration of 12:1 ratio
and optimum cruising ratio of 16.7:1.

As for unsafe ones, turning off the engine is the most obvious one here. It kills
the brake lights, kills power steering (not many vehicles without it now), kills
power brakes, takes out any warning lights/indicators, and wears out your drivetrain
faster because oil is not circulating as designed.
As for killing the engine but leaving the key on. Your power steering and brakes
are still gone, plus that will kill your sparking system. If the vehicle had points
it'd be fine, but most have pulser coils now, and if they're powered but not being
used (as in engine off key on) it kills them fast.

Engine troubles also abound with putting the transmission in park after your key is
turned off. The engines now a days are almost exclusively fuel injected. That
means they have different fuel settings for different statuses/gears/etc. A vehicle
needs to be able to adjust for that, hence why the idle temporarily jumps when you
put it in park or neutral. It also prepares the electronics to be shut off.

Neutral while stopping. It may seem like a good idea, but it's doing the exact
opposite of what you want it to. If you look at your tachometer while you're idling
at a stop sign in drive it drops down to about 800 RPM on average. That's lower
than the average of 1000-1200 RPM for neutral. It also wears out your transmission
faster, instead of lasting 150K miles it might last 80 or 100K.

Other than the ones I pointed out I agree with and utilize most of those in my daily
driving. I drive a 1997 Toyota Camry that's completely stock with over 120K miles
on it and get an average of 20 MPG in city and 25-28 highway.

Also, if you have any responses or would like to refute my claims, please feel free
to contact me, I'm always open to debate and learning. And who knows, I may be
wrong on something and too thick to think about it! Have a great day!
Ryan
---
Go nuts guys...
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2008, 02:30 PM   #58 (permalink)
Experimental
 
RH77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,282

Teggy - '98 Integra LS
90 day: 35.26 mpg (US)
Preface: I'm also a "Mechanic" (self-certified).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike View Post
Driving with your lights on does not decrease your fuel
efficiency. On any vehicle the alternator is turning at the same relative speed as
the vehicle's engine. That means that it's going to continue charging the battery
and shunting the excess voltage back into the alternator.
What about the voltage regulator? I drive with my lights on all the time for safety reasons. For most of your responses, they need to be backed up by fuel-flow rates. This has already been done here and through other sites.

Quote:
the warmer the tires, the more they stick, causing a decrease
in mileage.
Source? In fact this is the opposite. Some research will show otherwise.

Quote:
To be honest, Cold Air Intake systems usually increase mileage because
of the cold air, the warmer the air the more of it has to pass through to get the
same effect as a smaller amount of cold air, and the amount of fuel injected depends
on the amount of air passing through. So down to about 30 degrees or so it's
actually more efficient to drive in the cold than the warm.
My shop manual (and collected data) show otherwise. So is the cold air specific to Edsels, Hondas, or Jaguars -- or ALL cars. Source?

Quote:
You also seem to like turning the engine off.
Yup.

Quote:
While that does save gas to coast it
also takes an approximate fuel/air mixture of 8:1 for a cold engine and a mixture of
10:1 for a warm engine, compared with pedal to the metal acceleration of 12:1 ratio
and optimum cruising ratio of 16.7:1.
This ratio lasts for how long? When does the idle consumption equal the restart consumption? You'll be surprised to find out.

Quote:
the brake lights
I nearly rest my case, your honor.

Quote:
faster because oil is not circulating as designed.
We don't coast in gear...

The rest requires a healthy search of real data instead of what appears to be assumptions.

RH77
__________________

_______1998 Acura Integra 3-Door, Automatic _______
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2008, 02:37 PM   #59 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Peterborough, Ontario
Posts: 376

Jetta - '05 Jetta
I invited him to come and join us... hopefully he does!
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2008, 03:05 PM   #60 (permalink)
02 Golf TDI Driver
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Scott, La
Posts: 875

The Golf - '02 Golf GLS TDI
90 day: 54.79 mpg (US)

Mongoose - '05 E-bike AWD
90 day: 1810.34 mpg (US)
Send a message via AIM to dremd
--------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike View Post
Re: Your tips.
I was reading some of your tips, and have some feedback on them.
1. Some of them are untrue.
2. Some of them are very unsafe
3. Some of them will cause your car to break down early (I'm a professional mechanic.)

As for the untrue ones. Driving with your lights on does not decrease your fuel
efficiency. On any vehicle the alternator is turning at the same relative speed as
the vehicle's engine. That means that it's going to continue charging the battery
and shunting the excess voltage back into the alternator. Only when you're using a
HECK OF A LOT of power is it going to start using battery voltage to power it all.
Not true, the field circuit weakens the field (am I saying that correctly?) reducing ouput and therefore load. If it were true, then why would some race cars install devices to weaken the field when at WOT?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike View Post
And by a heck of a lot I mean neons, a sound system, and a multi-screen DVD display
in the car all running at the same time.
I noticed that this is false before I was in to Fuel economy, my Supra went for 17.5~18 down to 16.5~17 When I used my car computer + 15" display + 2000 watt stereo + Neon + dual power seats + . . . .. (over 100 amps continuous draw when maxed draining from a 90 amp alternator, which didn't last long) I tried a tank with everything switched off and fuel economy returned to normal, from then on I used electrical accessories when needed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike View Post
Also, when a vehicle is warm it does have greater efficiency in fuel usage, true,
but at the same time, the warmer the tires, the more they stick, causing a decrease
in mileage.
Well this is partially true, however tires don't get very hot from driving efficiently. And you are ignoring hot grease, hot transmission fluid, hot transfer case fluid. I can tell that my car is significantly easier to push (by hand in my driveway) when hot than when cold, couple that with a cold / less efficient engine and you have significantly worse fuel economy (30% in my case; your mileage will vary)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike View Post
To be honest, Cold Air Intake systems usually increase mileage because
of the cold air, the warmer the air the more of it has to pass through to get the
same effect as a smaller amount of cold air, and the amount of fuel injected depends
on the amount of air passing through. So down to about 30 degrees or so it's
actually more efficient to drive in the cold than the warm.
Someone else will reply who knows more about this subject, but in general the idea is to decease the effective engine size, thereby running it at a higher throttle which is typically more efficient, at very least, it warms the engine up faster.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike View Post
You also seem to like turning the engine off. While that does save gas to coast it
also takes an approximate fuel/air mixture of 8:1 for a cold engine and a mixture of
10:1 for a warm engine, compared with pedal to the metal acceleration of 12:1 ratio
and optimum cruising ratio of 16.7:1.
My Wideband make sit look like my supra starts lean . . . 15~16 to 1 ish. Diesel doesn't have an O2 sensor, so I can't comment.
You are also contradicting yourself about colder engines being more efficient

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike View Post
As for unsafe ones, turning off the engine is the most obvious one here. It kills
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike View Post
the brake lights,
False, go outside get someone to put their foot on the brake pedal (with the key in their pocket) and look at the brake lights, in every vehicle I have ever seen they have stayed on


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike View Post
kills power steering (not many vehicles without it now),
True! This is where someone needs to know their vehicle, some drive fine without power steering, some do not, some situations are safer with it, some don't matter.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike View Post
kills power brakes,
False, I get at least 3 full stops without adding vacuum to the booster (tested in mountains) and you will need to start the engine once you are stopped, replenishing your vacuum reservoir.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike View Post
takes out any warning lights/indicators,
Mixed. On some cars the indicators will stop, this is an issue if turning. I have modified mine to always work. As far as warning lights they will work at all times.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike View Post
and wears out your drivetrain
faster because oil is not circulating as designed.
Debatable, if you are leaving the engine off for several minutes there is some oil drain back, but assuming that your anti-drain back valve is functional (inside most oil filters) then it will be only a few drops. However all those hours that your engine is not idling, it is also not wearing at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike View Post
As for killing the engine but leaving the key on. Your power steering and brakes
are still gone, plus that will kill your sparking system.
False on modern engines; True for points; (When was the last time you saw a car with points? my 66 bus was swapped to electronic as soon as I burnt the coil up leaving the key on to run the stereo), which may (if the engine stoped in the wrong spot continue charging the coil, and overheat it (ask me how I know).


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike<