Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-17-2014, 06:35 PM   #11 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,217
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
Oh, it is the end of the world when someone's phone dies!

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-17-2014, 06:44 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,158
Thanks: 120
Thanked 2,790 Times in 1,959 Posts
What caught my attention was the cars not in or not allowed into the US market.

Also I was unaware of some of these car models, but I'm not a big sedan fan either.

More sedans than fastbacks...................guess they don't use a template to cookie cutter their designs.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

Chin Spoiler:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...effective.html

Rear Spoiler Pick Up Truck
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...xperiment.html

Roof Wing
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...1-a-19525.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2014, 08:52 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
My friend just bought a CLA recently. On the freeway, at 80mph he was getting better gas mileage than my much smaller car gets doing 70mph...and the C pillars don't even taper inward! That is probably more because of the gearing and better engine but normally at 80mph the drag is pretty serious whereas the CLA just shrugs it off.

My guess is that Mercedes Benz is paying a lot of attention to the wheel wells and underbody, because their cars never have any greenhouse plan taper. Porsche cars look like they should have a smaller wake but the Cd ends up higher despite the clever radiator ducting and wind deflectors and everything. They do put rather fat tires on Porsches though. Makes you wonder if it's possible to improve aero significantly with just modified fenders and wheel spat thingies.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2014, 09:37 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 40.02 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 49.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
...yes, the "magic" of trained electrons at your (or MS's or NSA's) service!

Like I asked my kid "...but, what are you gonna DO when the batteries die in your calculator?" when he tried to argue against doing his "times" & "divides" homework exercises by hand--using HIS brain instead of a calcultor.
I tried that argument with my kid. He popped the cover off.

"No sweat. Solar panel."
__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2014, 10:45 PM   #15 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,217
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by elhigh View Post
I tried that argument with my kid. He popped the cover off.

"No sweat. Solar panel."
Smart kid!
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2014, 12:23 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
The VW XL1 is the lowest CdA car ever produced. 1.5 sq m = 16.1 sq ft X 0.19 = 3.059 sq ft CdA.

Cd is more important than frontal area, because once the Cd get lower, it has a much larger effect on lowering the drag. It is much more practical and is actually easier to lower the Cd than it is to lower the area.

An example: take a medium sized car that has a frontal area of 25 sq ft and a Cd of 0.34. The CdA is 8.5 sq ft.

If you reduce the Cd to 0.2, then the CdA is 5 sq ft. If you tried to reduce the area to get that low, without also improving the Cd, the frontal area would have to be 14.7 sq ft - which too tiny to be very practical.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/

Last edited by NeilBlanchard; 04-18-2014 at 12:34 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2014, 02:16 PM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Sonny Cash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: fulton,ny
Posts: 8

Old Faithful - '97 Infiniti i30 Touring
90 day: 24.87 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
thanks for this thread! the s class surprised the hell outta me. its fkn huge!! gotta hand it to the germans at first i thought they where just overpriced like a mac. but after paying attention to theyre technology and such theyre paving the way. and the mazda 3's CD is an impressive .26 ill take one of those any day
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2014, 05:33 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,158
Thanks: 120
Thanked 2,790 Times in 1,959 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
Cd is more important than frontal area, because once the Cd get lower, it has a much larger effect on lowering the drag. It is much more practical and is actually easier to lower the Cd than it is to lower the area.
That's a bold stance, but I cannot say that I disagree with it.

Back when we compared the first generation Honda Insight to the GM Impact/ EV1 I came out with the impression Cd was more important than Area. However as with most things in life every case should be taken individually as generalizations can be misleading.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

Chin Spoiler:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...effective.html

Rear Spoiler Pick Up Truck
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...xperiment.html

Roof Wing
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...1-a-19525.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2014, 06:59 AM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
The physics is the physics. The VW XL1 is lowest frontal area I know of. On other threads people complain it is small and cramped. So, we need to lower the Cd, and consider the practical requirements, rather than get overly concerned with frontal area.

The Pillbug is a huge frontal area, but with a Cd of 0.18, and the ability to carry up to 7 people, it has lower drag than almost anything we have on the road today.

The Cd is the best way to compare the aerodynamic design across the spectrum of vehicles.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2014, 01:18 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,861
Thanks: 23,922
Thanked 7,207 Times in 4,640 Posts
shape but also......

Quote:
Originally Posted by elhigh View Post
The M-B B-class seems to be applying lessons learned from the Boxfish (actually called the Bionic) concept. Its Cd was the same as the XL1 at 0.19. Larger area of course, the XL1 being not only the shape but also the size of a large suppository.
If we're very fortunate,we'll live to see suppository car forms dating to 1907.
The Physicians Desk Reference illustrates some beautiful,fluid dynamic, rectal and vaginal versions.

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com