Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-27-2011, 11:51 AM   #1 (permalink)
The Fit is MPGo!
 
Dunkler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 87

Blue - '07 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
90 day: 42.71 mpg (US)

Hot Rod - '84 GMC C1500
Thanks: 20
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Ram Air VS. Upper grill block

I got the idea from this article on a Honda Insight.

I had been considering an upper grill block, but then I saw the above link in another thread on this forum and that got me thinking. I could maybe block the passenger half of my upper grill and then use snorkel system as seen in the link to use some of that air to "force" or channel it into my air box on the driver side.



What are your thoughts on this?

My average driving in the car is hwy. My average speed is 55-60 mph.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-27-2011, 12:26 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
piers.singer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sussex/Kent, UK
Posts: 108
Thanks: 4
Thanked 23 Times in 12 Posts
I'd go for the full grille block myself. Reading the article it seems as though he didn't find any measurable gains with his system, whereas an upper grille block should give you an immediate and demonstrable aero (and therefore FE) improvement.
__________________
Spoken like a champion. Oh no, disaster!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to piers.singer For This Useful Post:
Dunkler (06-27-2011)
Old 06-27-2011, 01:04 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurcher
 
mort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 333
Thanks: 148
Thanked 109 Times in 80 Posts
Hi Dunkler,
Ram intake can only improve efficiency at full throttle. How much increase in fe can you get from ram air? Very small. How much decrease in drag from full grill block vs partial block, well some anyway, but also small. So consider the amount of time you run full throttle vs the amount of time that you are forcing cooling air through the radiator that you don't need. If you get on the freeway at full throttle for 10 seconds, then cruise for 20 minutes at part throttle, that's 120 times longer. I don't see how ram air can be better for that kind of driving.

-mort

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dunkler View Post
I got the idea from this article on a Honda Insight.

I had been considering an upper grill block, but then I saw the above link in another thread on this forum and that got me thinking. I could maybe block the passenger half of my upper grill and then use snorkel system as seen in the link to use some of that air to "force" or channel it into my air box on the driver side.



What are your thoughts on this?

My average driving in the car is hwy. My average speed is 55-60 mph.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mort For This Useful Post:
Dunkler (06-27-2011)
Old 06-27-2011, 01:14 PM   #4 (permalink)
The Fit is MPGo!
 
Dunkler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 87

Blue - '07 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
90 day: 42.71 mpg (US)

Hot Rod - '84 GMC C1500
Thanks: 20
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mort, so what you are saying is that I would likely see an increase in FE from blocking the whole upper grill before I would see any benefit from using "forced" induction for part of it.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 02:15 PM   #5 (permalink)
Making Ecomods a G thing
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 655

Angie - '08 Infiniti G35 X
90 day: 22.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 75 Times in 58 Posts
I would agree with Mort on this one, there have been plenty of proven gains from partial and full grill block, but I have yet to see anybody prove any gain from ram air at other than WOT(Wide Open Throttle), and even then the benefit was negligible.

@Mort, also take into account that most full load (100%) acceleration isn't done anywhere near full throttle and you effectively make any possible gains from ram air null and void. On my Ultragauge I accelerate at ~30% TPS, Idle is 14.1% TPS and pedal to the floor shows 76% TPS. I rarely get to even 50% TPS and therefore don't ever get to WOT which makes ram air useless
__________________

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Joenavy85 For This Useful Post:
Dunkler (06-27-2011)
Old 06-27-2011, 02:27 PM   #6 (permalink)
The Fit is MPGo!
 
Dunkler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 87

Blue - '07 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
90 day: 42.71 mpg (US)

Hot Rod - '84 GMC C1500
Thanks: 20
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Thanks a lot guys for the knowledgeable responses! That is why I ask things here when my google search results are a bit ambiguous.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2012, 01:35 PM   #7 (permalink)
Got MPG?
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Southern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 330

The Car - '09 Toyota Corolla CE Enhanced
Thanks: 13
Thanked 43 Times in 38 Posts
I came across this thread after reading an article on the new generation Honda Insight. If you look at this picture: 2010 Chrysler Daewoo Dodge Ferrari Ford Hyundai Acura Honda Photo Gallery it seems as though Honda has placed some value in getting some cooler air with a velocity into the intake. The path comes through the upper grill then is directed by the vents through the rad support cowl towards the intake horn (which is quite large & pronounced).

There are some conclusions that I can draw from this:

1) The designers/engineers feel that colder than engine bay air is beneficial. Otherwise they would have easily put the intake end on top of the rad or directly behind it (like they did in the linked AutoSpeed article) to get a warm air intake.

2) The designers/engineer feel that taking advantage of some of the velocity of the air that is coming through the upper grill to be beneficial. Otherwise they would have routed the horn off to the side between the drivers side headlamp and battery somewhere, and not gone through the trouble of designing the radiator cowl vents etc.

They have designed the upper grill on the new Insight to be fairly aero with the wide bars so they do seem to be taking advantage of the concept, but not entirely as it isn't 100% blocked...which it could be because its a 'mild hybrid' and that area isn't designated for inverter cooling like it is on the Prius. 2010 Chrysler Daewoo Dodge Ferrari Ford Hyundai Acura Honda Photo Gallery
__________________
2013 Honda Civic Si - 2.4L
OEM front to back belly pan from the factory.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2012, 07:25 PM   #8 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,175

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 269
Thanked 3,522 Times in 2,796 Posts
Unless you stuffed a diesel in there, ram air won't do much for fuel ecomomy.
I think you would be better off with a grill block.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2012, 07:43 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 829
Thanks: 44
Thanked 104 Times in 80 Posts
Is it possible that a properly sized slot used as an air intake has an actual aerodynamic advantage over a block? A block means pushing the air aside, which is drag. An intake that is sucking air in at something close to the car's speed, should be pretty clean, aerodynamically s[peaking, I would think.

As for the ram air effect, the only way I see it possibly helping is during pulse and glide operation and I'm not sure if it is helpful there. I could certainly see where it is a hinderance. Remember, a CAI means less air is needed for a given power output. And less air means more pumping loss.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2012, 08:39 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 355

The Truck - '02 Nissan GU Patrol ST
Thanks: 5
Thanked 76 Times in 50 Posts
Mine is a Turbo Diesel and when I did the Ram Air setup I got an improvement engine response, power & economy, that is because delivering a higher pressure to the turbo, means the turbo is using less power to suck the air in.
On a gas engine ram air and CAI can help, but not as much & depending on your stock setup & tune maybe not at all. On most gas engines I have looked up they are all inclined to draw in cooler air, even those with intake in the engine bay, if you look carefully you will see they will be positioned to draw air that is slipping past the radiator, or some other holes in the front panels. Hot air is good to get the car warmed up, but cooler air is better once up to temp. I know a lot of people claim better FE with a Hot AI, can't say anything on that, but being so easy to do, I would think that all cars would just be set up in stock form for Hot AI from the factory if it was better.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com