Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register
Now


Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-06-2008, 03:30 AM   #1 (permalink)
Gas guzzler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 5

Big-Donkey Engine - '02 Tahoe
90 day: 21.43 mpg (US)
20 MPG in Chevy Tahoe, Why?

Traveling 400 miles in Texas with one thing in mind. Economy. I was driving the family car, a '02 Tahoe (14/17mpg with a Vortec V-8) and gained a mere 3 mpg. I kept the speed low, sped up on downhills, coasted up hills, and pulsed to an extent. I kept the A/C off (to the great chagrin of my mother) and all vehicle conditions were ideal, although stock.

In 98 deg. Texas weather, is it advisable to block the grille? I understand AC won't work well, but hey, $4.00/gal? Crazy becomes wise at that point.

What did I do wrong? Why only 3 extra MPG? Should I have P&G'd more? With the auto tranny in the Tahoe, it decelerated rapidly with no gas, and popping it into N every 8 seconds for 6 hours seems a very bad idea. Advice?

Thank you for the 3 mpg, but I want more!

Logan W.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 03:39 AM   #2 (permalink)
Ohh snap
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WV
Posts: 105

Lesbaru - '00 Outback
90 day: 29.67 mpg (US)

Scoot - '07 Stealth
90 day: 1273.97 mpg (US)

Ninjer - '98 Ninja 250
90 day: 68.58 mpg (US)
Send a message via AIM to brucey
3 MPG is a big difference on a low MPG vehicle. You saved around 15$ on that trip by my calculations.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 12:20 PM   #3 (permalink)
Power tuner gone eco
 
whatthe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 33

Prudence - '93 325 i
90 day: 36.64 mpg (US)
That's still almost a 20% improvement.

One of the problems with something like the Tahoe is aerodynamics and weight. To overcome rolling resistance and aero at 70-75mph, you probably need 40-50hp just to cruise!

Best thing on a heavier and less aerodynamic vehicle is to keep speeds low...

As an example, 85mph in my Aristo (similar to GS300) is just about the same horsepower as 65mph in my wifes Mazda Tribute. Vehicles weigh similar, but aerodynamics are vastly different.
__________________
1992 - Suzuki Swift GT
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 01:25 PM   #4 (permalink)
Power tuner gone eco
 
whatthe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 33

Prudence - '93 325 i
90 day: 36.64 mpg (US)
Check out the bottom graph I made up in this thread. I'd lower results a little for the extra size of the Tahoe perhaps, but may give you an idea of where to be.

Theoretical Mileage Charts
__________________
1992 - Suzuki Swift GT
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 04:27 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Auburn, NH
Posts: 421

Wicked Wanda - '99 Beetle GLS
90 day: 30.08 mpg (US)

Green Monster - '99 Explorer Sport
90 day: 16.99 mpg (US)

Dad's Taxi - '99 Odyssey EX
90 day: 24.22 mpg (US)
My question is was the $15 worth the aggravation? I use hypermiling techniques when alone but I'd never submit my family to 6 hours in 98 degree Texas heat without A/C. If that money was the difference between going or not going then the shared sacrifice is understandable. If that had been my mom she would have said: "Here's a $20, put on the F&*%#g A/C!
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 04:37 PM   #6 (permalink)
Red
Master EcoModder
 
Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UCLA
Posts: 665

Heep - '01 Wrangler Sport
90 day: 16.78 mpg (US)

Dingbat - '00 Insight DX
Send a message via MSN to Red Send a message via Yahoo to Red
For me I'd say on a trip no its not worth it, but daily driven it does add up
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 05:12 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
mush3gan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: LA
Posts: 31

Mi-chan - '05 Corolla S
90 day: 35.26 mpg (US)
you have to look at the % improvement, not just the numbers. 3 mpg is a lot for 14/17..
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 06:29 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
gascort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 198

Gascort - '93 Escort Wagon
90 day: 40.9 mpg (US)
On a road trip, in a large vehicle with a huge Cd, your best bet is to inflate the tires somewhere between factory spec and sidewall max, use the a/c on recirculate, and drive at the speed limit, tailing a truck by 5+ car lengths for safety.

P&G is not advisable for an automatic transmission, plus you have to use the starter to restart the engine, which uses lots of electrical energy that must be made up by the alternator. In a manual, you can bump start and eliminate damage and electrical losses
__________________
"You laugh now at my recycled materials-ecomodded car. I laugh later when I see you at the fuel pump!"
The day will come (soon) when a Geo is worth more than a Hummer, except for scrap metal. http://www.scientificmethodfueleconomy.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 03:04 PM   #9 (permalink)
Gas guzzler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 5

Big-Donkey Engine - '02 Tahoe
90 day: 21.43 mpg (US)
The ac was broke

Therefore, we could only use it below 70mph and only on low uphill grades. Compressor is going out.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 03:29 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 488

2k2Prot5 - '02 Protege5
90 day: 33.82 mpg (US)
I think there was another thread complaining that MPG is a poor measure because 3mpg gain at 17 is twice as big as a 3mpg gain at 34. But just think, that means your next 3 should be cake
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 06:26 PM   #11 (permalink)
Nice Road Trucker
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Frozen Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 416

The Red Baron - '00 F-350 XLT
90 day: 26.83 mpg (US)
Not only is the Tahoe about as sleek as a box of Wheaties, but that automatic and that half-ton of four wheel drive machinery you tote around not doing you any favors.

But people didn't lay out the big bucks for SUVs without a reason. They do a lot of things well. Because there are so many of these monsters and because people (especially women) like them, if one can get a 25% improvement that is a huge improvement in national gasoline consumption.

I think with the right mods (which would also open new vistas of hypermiling), you could squeeze 23-25 MPG out of it, and retain most of the functionality.

I get 27 MPG out of a bigger vehicle and run the AC anytime I get hot - for a porker like me thats April through mid-October here on the scorched steppes of central Indiana.
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam 3.08:1 gears
"Fastback" Bed Fairing
Rugged Air Dam with Side Skirts
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 08:00 PM   #12 (permalink)
Nice Road Trucker
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Frozen Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 416

The Red Baron - '00 F-350 XLT
90 day: 26.83 mpg (US)
Here's a couple of thoughts.

Do you use the four-wheel drive? Most SUVs really do not use it.

If yes forget about it.

If no, try this. Remove the half-shafts on the front axle. This way the front axles lose all the drag of the front pumpkin and transfer case. Even with the hubs unlocked there is some friction from all that machinery. This is fairly easy to reverse in the late fall when you may really need 4x4.

Also, check your disc brakes for rubbing. The metallic brakes used these days tend to rust. Most of the pucks are cleaned off by brake action but the edges are not swept by the discs so they can rust, which makes them swell up and rub at the edges.
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam 3.08:1 gears
"Fastback" Bed Fairing
Rugged Air Dam with Side Skirts
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 09:04 PM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 65

Silver EP3 - '02 Civic Si
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spiffytexan View Post
Traveling 400 miles in Texas with one thing in mind. Economy. I was driving the family car, a '02 Tahoe (14/17mpg with a Vortec V-8) and gained a mere 3 mpg. I kept the speed low, sped up on downhills, coasted up hills, and pulsed to an extent. I kept the A/C off (to the great chagrin of my mother) and all vehicle conditions were ideal, although stock.

In 98 deg. Texas weather, is it advisable to block the grille? I understand AC won't work well, but hey, $4.00/gal? Crazy becomes wise at that point.

What did I do wrong? Why only 3 extra MPG? Should I have P&G'd more? With the auto tranny in the Tahoe, it decelerated rapidly with no gas, and popping it into N every 8 seconds for 6 hours seems a very bad idea. Advice?

Thank you for the 3 mpg, but I want more!

Logan W.

3 mpg will save you more $$$ than 7 mpg in my car! Do the math! That's about 25% savings!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 04:15 PM   #14 (permalink)
Red
Master EcoModder
 
Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UCLA
Posts: 665

Heep - '01 Wrangler Sport
90 day: 16.78 mpg (US)

Dingbat - '00 Insight DX
Send a message via MSN to Red Send a message via Yahoo to Red
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Dave View Post
If no, try this. Remove the half-shafts on the front axle. This way the front axles lose all the drag of the front pumpkin and transfer case. Even with the hubs unlocked there is some friction from all that machinery. This is fairly easy to reverse in the late fall when you may really need 4x4.
I'd say before you do this, check to make sure your unit bearings are designed to run without the half shafts. For a Jeep, the bears will fall apart without the shafts installed, or bare minimum the stub shafts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 06:11 PM   #15 (permalink)
Nice Road Trucker
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Frozen Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 416

The Red Baron - '00 F-350 XLT
90 day: 26.83 mpg (US)
If you don't need the 4x4 and have to have the half-shafts to keep your wheel bearings together, the surgery gets more serious. Pull the diff and ring gear. That will lose all the friction from the front drive. At that point you may as well remove the transfer case and lengthen the rear drive shaft.

Most folks are not that radical about MPG - yet.
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam 3.08:1 gears
"Fastback" Bed Fairing
Rugged Air Dam with Side Skirts
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2008, 09:16 PM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: illinois
Posts: 71

EP3 - '03 Civic Si
90 day: 31.73 mpg (US)

Scooter - '93 Elite 80
90 day: 74.87 mpg (US)

Ape - '07 Sportcity 250ie
90 day: 66.97 mpg (US)
If that thingis automatic you are kind of limited. Like they have said 3mpg is pretty good for a vehicle rated in the mid 10's. YOu have to realize there are mechnical limits to what your vehicle can do mpg wise. You have a heavy non aerodynamic vehicle, this is probably your biggest hurdle. MAybe try some extensive weight reduction? Then you have a very hungry powertrain. I mean the parasitic loss of a v8 chevy ohv with all the 4wd junk and an automatic tranny is phenomenal. Like the others said see if you can get rid of the frontportion of you 4wd. drive at a sustained low speed, like 60-65 on the highway(your big, people won't mind lol) i wouldn't recomend speeding up and coasting and speeding up again in something that big and heavy. It takes alot of gas to speed back up to those speeds. For instance my friend gets 24mpg cruising in his cherokee, but under acceleration he gets about 6mpg. So cruising is more efficient for him unless he has a considerable hill. My civic which weighs like 1200 pounds less with amore efficient engine requires less gas to speed back upso it can work in the right situations.

In the end you may think about getting something like a honda odyssey that's rated for i believe 30mpg highway. But i think with the right driving, some weight reduction, 4wd disconnect, driving slow and sustained speed, and whatever else you can think of, i think you could see 24mpg highway, but thats probably the max unless you do some more extensive mods.
But definatly don't give up. Higher mpg's are always better.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2008, 11:54 PM   #17 (permalink)
Red
Master EcoModder
 
Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UCLA
Posts: 665

Heep - '01 Wrangler Sport
90 day: 16.78 mpg (US)

Dingbat - '00 Insight DX
Send a message via MSN to Red Send a message via Yahoo to Red
A crazy alternative would be to find someone with a 2WD Tahoe that wants to covert to 4WD then just swap stuff out.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 09:48 AM   #18 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: illinois
Posts: 71

EP3 - '03 Civic Si
90 day: 31.73 mpg (US)

Scooter - '93 Elite 80
90 day: 74.87 mpg (US)

Ape - '07 Sportcity 250ie
90 day: 66.97 mpg (US)
Sounds like a good idea to me
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2008, 12:33 AM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: southern, wv
Posts: 134

yoder - '98 tacoma 4x4
90 day: 27.51 mpg (US)

Ruby - '07 Camry SE
90 day: 30 mpg (US)
get a scangauge.
remove your cross bars on the roof rack(most tahoes ahve them)
with the scangauge, check your temp. if it is like my friends silverado runs about 200 deg, and never goes above 203ish.
then do a grill block start from the top and work your way down.
if your a/c compressor is going bad either fix it or ditch it....it causes drag.
iflate your tires.
__________________

trying hard, commuter/ toy.


not trying one bit. mainly around town.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2008, 04:26 PM   #20 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 7
re:

May I suggest drafting big trucks!!!! Obviously, be safe about it, and I don't want a nasty email when a rock cracks your windshield, BUT......

I have been doing this for the last few days and have seen big improvements. I use the digital mpg display to determine the difference -- I don't have a scanguage -- and there appears to be a 3-4 mpg increase (24 to 28 or so) when I cruise behind a big truck at 55mph, as opposed to having no one in front of me. This is based on limited experience (so far), but there is a very noticeable difference, at the very least. More info to follow, once I collect some more data.

FYI: I have an '07 Tundra, which is about as aerodynamic as, well, something that's not aerodynamic at all. I think the drafting technique helps us boxy truck guys far more than it helps the little 40+ mpg folk.

Good luck with the Tahoe.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
News: Chevy Cobalt XFE (new model with top of class highway MPG) RH77 General Efficiency Discussion 19 08-01-2008 03:10 AM
2007 Chevy Silverado 15 mpg!!! twentyinchersbmx EcoModding Central 17 06-02-2008 08:55 PM
Review: 2008 Chevy Malibu LT (31.3 MPG) RH77 General Efficiency Discussion 9 05-16-2008 05:30 PM
Article: 57 mpg? That's so 20 years ago SVOboy General Efficiency Discussion 17 12-23-2007 10:56 PM
GM's Tahoe SUV hybrid ad claims better MPG than Camry* MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 4 12-20-2007 12:47 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
All content copyright EcoModder.com