Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-28-2014, 10:31 PM   #11 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,457

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,212
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist View Post
I am seeing 4,277 pounds for the Jeep and 5,441 for the Dodge--the truck is 27% heavier!
It just goes to show that weight doesn't much affect fuel economy.

Surprisingly, the EPA rates the truck at 1 MPG better than Jeep in city driving. Aero and weight can't explain the advantage the truck has, so I'm guessing it's the transmission.

__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
mcrews (10-29-2014)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-29-2014, 12:12 AM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
Surprisingly, the EPA rates the truck at 1 MPG better than Jeep in city driving. Aero and weight can't explain the advantage the truck has, so I'm guessing it's the transmission.
CRR is a big factor on the city cycle and light truck tyres can be considered LRR's compared to any of the off road-ish treads.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to oldtamiyaphile For This Useful Post:
mcrews (10-29-2014), redpoint5 (10-29-2014)
Old 10-29-2014, 05:54 AM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
adam728's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 161

Mazda3 - '08 Mazda 3 S
90 day: 29.65 mpg (US)

DR650SE - '13 Suzuki DR650SE
90 day: 46.16 mpg (US)

Wife's - '12 GMC Terrain SLE-2
Thanks: 2
Thanked 22 Times in 18 Posts
Here's a good link.
http://www.rambodybuilder.com/2014/d...ammlup1500.pdf
On the low end you have a 2wd, regular cab, short bed Tradesman at 4,512 lbs.
On the high end you have a crew cab 4x4 with the diesel at 6,147 lbs.

On Ram's site they list the lightest as a 2wd, regular cab, short bed Sport, 4,525 lbs.

According to Jeep's webpage a 4 door Rubicon is 4,340 lbs.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 07:06 AM   #14 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 29.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,225
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by adam728 View Post
On the high end you have a crew cab 4x4 with the diesel at 6,147 lbs.
That high-end 6,147-pound diesel is rated 19/27.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2014, 01:52 AM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,653

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touraeg
Thanks: 301
Thanked 1,177 Times in 807 Posts
Its the 8 speed. A Jeep grand Cherokee which gets the 8 speed beats the Ram in fuel economy comparing 4x4 to 4x4.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2014, 10:07 AM   #16 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
It shows that how you use the power is what has the most effect. Taller gearing helps a lot, and in the EPA test where driving style is consistent, cramming more gears into the slushbox will get you more efficient operation.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2014, 03:30 PM   #17 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,586 Times in 1,554 Posts
I made a mistake. His Jeep is a 6 speed manual, not 5 speed auto. They are rated the same though.

Here is the comparison I came up with off of fueleconomy.gov. Looks like the 4wd to 2wd makes up a 2 mpg highway difference.

Sadly, the Grand Cherokee doesn't come with a manual, so I couldn't compare it real accurately.

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	jeep.jpg
Views:	280
Size:	101.1 KB
ID:	16238  
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2014, 10:49 AM   #18 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: harrisburg pa
Posts: 121
Thanks: 5
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
As a 1995 Wrangler owner I will attest that this is a perfect platform to show that aerodynamics is the greatest factor in gas mileage. I average 22 mpg either suburbs or highway. Pulled the cage off the roof and went from 16 mpg to 20 mpg. Smaller thinner tires no significant change. Synthetic oil, free flow cat back, new plugs and KN air filter, no significant change. Tire pressure at 40 lbs over 36 adds 1-2 mpgs. Tail wind on the highway and I can hit 24 mpg. Some day I will add belly pans or air dam.

__________________
With my Wrangler I average 40 mpg. Triumph Speedmaster 60 mpg + Jeep 20 mpg = 40 mpg!
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com