09-29-2010, 01:55 PM
|
#61 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
1-3 mpg starts to add up. I'd love to get my Civic SI into the mid to upper 30s...
|
|
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2010, 04:04 PM
|
#62 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bartine
1-3 mpg starts to add up.
|
Exactly.
Gain a little bit here, a bit there, and it all adds up to a marked difference.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2010, 04:42 PM
|
#63 (permalink)
|
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
...think: second-place is FIRST-runner up!
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2010, 06:48 PM
|
#64 (permalink)
|
|
eco....something or other
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 719
Thanks: 39
Thanked 61 Times in 46 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadeTreeMech
GM's 3800 and Ford's 300 I-6 are two engines that I think fall under the unsung heroes category, in that they are both low end torquey engines that don't ever seem to want to give up. It's sad they stopped production in '06, which ended the 39 year reign of an excellent engine. I just read the wikipedia article for the Buick 3.8L here, and it has a very interesting history. It's very similar with the 3.0L Nissan engine, which IIRC had the ability to support 600HP with the proper heads etc.
I understand progress is necessary, but some things need not be replaced, only slightly altered to keep up with the times. |
I have both, and they are both very good motors. I am running them both at about 50% epa.
__________________
1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
|
|
|
|
|
10-02-2010, 09:01 AM
|
#65 (permalink)
|
|
Basjoos Wannabe
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
|
I had a chance to buy a 96 Ford F-150 with the I-6 in it.
I'm kicking myself now that I didn't.
__________________
 RIP Maxima 1997-2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-02-2010, 03:46 PM
|
#66 (permalink)
|
|
eco....something or other
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 719
Thanks: 39
Thanked 61 Times in 46 Posts
|
They are all over, just look around. Maybe put up a wanted ad.
__________________
1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
|
|
|
|
|
10-03-2010, 04:23 AM
|
#67 (permalink)
|
|
Basjoos Wannabe
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
|
I know they are. It's the lack of money that always gets in the way 
That and it's hard to find a good vehicle in these parts. The population is just too danged small.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-03-2010, 12:36 PM
|
#68 (permalink)
|
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
OOH! I need to check that place out!
|
|
|
|
|
