Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-24-2011, 10:37 PM   #1 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,352

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 330 Times in 249 Posts
50 most Fuel Efficient cars in Europe

...50 most economical diesel and petrol european cars:

The most fuel efficient vehicles - Spritmonitor.de

...and, here's their "search" function to look for other vehicles:

http://www.spritmonitor.de/en/search.html


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
• 2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
• 2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
• 2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
• 2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

• 1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
• 1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
• 1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
• 1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
• 1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M

Last edited by Old Tele man; 12-24-2011 at 10:47 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2011, 12:19 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 233
Thanks: 11
Thanked 19 Times in 14 Posts
How many are available here?

The fact that they aren't is criminal.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2011, 12:55 PM   #3 (permalink)
Coroplast Engineer
 
Aveomiler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: suburban Chicago
Posts: 44

AV - '04 Aveo sedan - not LS
90 day: 32.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 16 Times in 7 Posts
Thanks a lot. Now I'm sad that I can't get most of them here. I want that Toyota Auris hybrid soooo bad. It gets better fuel economy on the European test cycle than the Prius, and I think it looks way better.
__________________
"In the olden days I always got the impression that TVR built a car, put it on sale, and then found out how it handled. Usually when one of their customers wrote to the factory complaining about how dead he was." - Jeremy Clarkson



AV Build Thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2011, 02:09 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoBus Driver
 
tinduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 51

EcoBus - '09 Multivan SL
90 day: 41.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Do not feel too sorry for yourselves :-) I had a real eye opener some weeks ago. Had a lesson for some statistics software we use on the job, and the guy had some car data (weight, country of manufacture, engine size, fuel consumption etc.) to fiddle around with.

To make a long story short: american cars looked gruesome concerning fuel efficiency. BUT when we started to do different correlations, you could clearly see that FE correlated best with weight; groupings could be seen due to engine size and fuel type, but that was minor compared with the weight correlation.

Europeans (and japanese) car makers were always building low-weight cars (at least compared to US street cruisers). That is the whole difference.

Nuances will be added by heavy-duty AC, sluggish 3-speed auto trannys etc., but this is all chicken feed compared to the weight which must be accelerated.

So just go and look for the lowest weight american-made car, and you will have a winner... well, at least a reasonable competetive car concerning FE.

so long,

tinduck
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2011, 02:37 PM   #5 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,352

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 330 Times in 249 Posts
tinduck -- do you still have that data available? Would love to see those MPG vs. WT plots and correlations.
__________________
• 2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
• 2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
• 2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
• 2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

• 1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
• 1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
• 1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
• 1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
• 1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2011, 02:38 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 233
Thanks: 11
Thanked 19 Times in 14 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinduck View Post
Do not feel too sorry for yourselves :-) I had a real eye opener some weeks ago. Had a lesson for some statistics software we use on the job, and the guy had some car data (weight, country of manufacture, engine size, fuel consumption etc.) to fiddle around with.

To make a long story short: american cars looked gruesome concerning fuel efficiency. BUT when we started to do different correlations, you could clearly see that FE correlated best with weight; groupings could be seen due to engine size and fuel type, but that was minor compared with the weight correlation.

Europeans (and japanese) car makers were always building low-weight cars (at least compared to US street cruisers). That is the whole difference.

Nuances will be added by heavy-duty AC, sluggish 3-speed auto trannys etc., but this is all chicken feed compared to the weight which must be accelerated.

So just go and look for the lowest weight american-made car, and you will have a winner... well, at least a reasonable competetive car concerning FE.

so long,

tinduck
so, we should be happy that our smallest cars have power everything and AC whether we want it or not? and, of course it costs a lot more and gets 40% lower FE?

yeah, i'm thrilled to death.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2011, 02:44 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 623

White Whale - '07 Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 33.32 mpg (US)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 119 Times in 67 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by pete c View Post
How many are available here?

The fact that they aren't is criminal.
Actually, to highlight the stupidity of the regulations, it actually would be criminal TO make many of them available here (at least the diesels).

But, to be fair, a large part of it is that the consumer demand isn't here like it is in Europe. That's probably a bigger obstacle than the regs.
__________________
Diesel Dave

~Life is an optimization problem.~

~Who says that just because your vehicle weighs over 3 tons that you can't get good mileage?~


Last edited by Diesel_Dave; 12-25-2011 at 03:12 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2011, 11:22 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
What pisses me off is that even if you, as an individual, were to import one of these vehicles for your own personal use, you can't get it licensed. I can legally drive a VW trike or a Jeep with 12" of lift or some ridiculous donk running on 32's, but a bone stock keijidosha? No way, that's obviously out of the question.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2011, 07:21 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Failed State Belgium
Posts: 2,956

Hδgar - '05 V50 1.6L Diesel
Diesel
90 day: 52.27 mpg (US)

Snert - '06 S40 1.6L Diesel
90 day: 58.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 283 Times in 228 Posts
Spritmonitor's HP to fuel efficiency graphs show it all.
More horses use more hay.

Power vs. mileage - Spritmonitor.de

This is in Liter/100 km, so higher is worse here !
__________________



Lifetime fuel consumption :
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2011, 08:07 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder View Post
Spritmonitor's HP to fuel efficiency graphs show it all.
More horses use more hay.

Power vs. mileage - Spritmonitor.de

This is in Liter/100 km, so higher is worse here !
How much of a correlation is there though? I notice that according to your graph, a vehicle with a 60 kW engine uses approximately half the fuel of a vehicle with a 300 kW engine. Presumably however, these are radically different vehicles. I would imagine that most cars with 300 kW motors are luxury cars, sports cars or trucks while most of the ones sporting 60 kW motors are economy cars. Put the same motor in the same car and I'll bet the difference would be much less significant.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to duffremle For This Useful Post:
taco (01-18-2012)
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com