Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Fossil Fuel Free
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-08-2009, 08:23 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
.

.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 

Last edited by Winfield1990; 12-25-2009 at 03:02 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 08:29 PM   #2 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,382

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)

Steve - '92 Festiva
Thanks: 955
Thanked 324 Times in 273 Posts
You can stop completely with reversed polarity braking, which isn't regenerative. Many fork-style trucks already do this, but it requires a skilled hand. (Foot?)

If you can give the regen phase a field strong enough to counteract the gravity-weight of the vehicle, it would remain still, but you'd have to maintain the field, which would kill your batteries in short order. (Compared to not using it.)

Unfortunately, I'm sure federal DOT requires that all vehicles have a mechanical service brake, and I think several states require a fluid-type brake as well for passenger vehicles in excess of N lbs.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 08:54 PM   #3 (permalink)
dcb
needs more cowbell
 
dcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,032

pimp mobile - '81 gs 250 t
90 day: 96.29 mpg (US)

schnitzel - '01 Golf TDI
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 156
Thanked 259 Times in 203 Posts
Well, Ernie Rojers taught me a new term called "well to wheels", but the answer is a horribly complicated and incestuous mess.

Let's be fair on the high-mileage EVs

There are even those that will insist riding a bike is worse than driving for that matter, and the agendas are not very bashful.

Best you can do is pick your fuel and keep beating your high score.
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 09:16 PM   #4 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,533

Blackfly - '98 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 67.07 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 125.37 mpg (US)

U.F.O. - '00 Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 85.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 1,019 Times in 568 Posts
I asked this same question to the EVDL a while back, and the Yodas of the list seemed to feel that system efficiency is in the 75% ballpark for a series DC conversion. That's batteries, controller, DC/DC, motor, contactors, etc.
__________________
Latest project: removable Geo Metro boat tail
Latest test: Massive cardboard air dam on a Geo Metro


www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 09:22 PM   #5 (permalink)
101% win
 
roflwaffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Where I live
Posts: 1,362

Camryaro - '92 Camry LE V6
90 day: 31.12 mpg (US)

Toy - '82 Pickup
90 day: 24.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 82
Thanked 64 Times in 43 Posts
Controller efficiency tends to be ~97%+ or similar, motor and charger are ~80-90% depending on the specifics . Everything else is variable and depends on driving route. Even if my lighting system draws 300W, at 60mph that's only ~5Wh/mile extra. Otoh, if I'm stuck in heavy traffic at a 5mph crawl, then my lighting system turns into a ~60Wh/mile draw, fairly significant. The same roughly goes for other electric accessories, albeit w/ different parameters.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2009, 07:16 AM   #6 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,674

Daox's Paseo - '97 Paseo
Team Toyota
Last 3: 53.99 mpg (US)

Daox's Prius - '04 Prius
90 day: 54.91 mpg (US)

CM400E - '81 CM400E
Thanks: 185
Thanked 431 Times in 298 Posts
Talking with the local guys, I believe the ranking would be:

3 phase AC
brushless DC (very close to 3 phase AC)
series wound DC
1 phase AC
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2009, 08:29 AM   #7 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,382

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)

Steve - '92 Festiva
Thanks: 955
Thanked 324 Times in 273 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
Talking with the local guys, I believe the ranking would be:

3 phase AC
brushless DC (very close to 3 phase AC)
series wound DC
1 phase AC
Daox -
Is this inclusive of controller/hardware efficiency as well?

I.E. - Lets assume the 3 phase motor is the most efficient, but the 3 phase controller, on average, is only 80% efficient... would that not make the brushless DC motor and controller the clear winner?

I believe that's what Winfield1990 was inferring in the last question. Interested to know myself, as well.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2009, 08:40 AM   #8 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,674

Daox's Paseo - '97 Paseo
Team Toyota
Last 3: 53.99 mpg (US)

Daox's Prius - '04 Prius
90 day: 54.91 mpg (US)

CM400E - '81 CM400E
Thanks: 185
Thanked 431 Times in 298 Posts
Well, the controller component that sends power to the motor uses the same components for AC or DC (mosfets or IGBTs). So, I don't think it will really matter.

This is really getting specific, and for all intents and purposes I've heard that brushless DC is the same as 3 phase AC. You'll likely never notice a difference in efficiency between the two on the road.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Daox For This Useful Post:
Christ (12-10-2009)
Old 12-10-2009, 08:41 AM   #9 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,382

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)

Steve - '92 Festiva
Thanks: 955
Thanked 324 Times in 273 Posts
But you gain the ability for regen, should you desire that, with 3 phase.

Thanks for the info!
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2009, 08:42 AM   #10 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,674

Daox's Paseo - '97 Paseo
Team Toyota
Last 3: 53.99 mpg (US)

Daox's Prius - '04 Prius
90 day: 54.91 mpg (US)

CM400E - '81 CM400E
Thanks: 185
Thanked 431 Times in 298 Posts
Well, you could also regen with a permanent magnet DC motor too.

FYI you responded fast, I edited my response as I don't think the conversion of DC to AC will have a noticeable effect on efficiency.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Electric car conversion: Project ForkenSwift MetroMPG Fossil Fuel Free 980 04-25-2012 10:12 AM
100 mile range Ranger EV? Frank Lee Fossil Fuel Free 10 08-05-2010 12:09 PM
Discussion on tire efficiency Ernie Rogers General Efficiency Discussion 68 02-21-2010 08:45 PM
Electric Cars Push Japan Engine Parts Makers to Crisis Mode tjts1 The Lounge 12 01-17-2010 12:23 PM
Test: 200w electric bicycle efficiency = 1512 MPG equivalent MetroMPG Fossil Fuel Free 30 07-03-2008 12:25 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com