Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-19-2010, 04:04 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 645

Chug - '96 Polo CL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 49.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Aero luggage

Does anyone make a 'backpack' for hatchback that could double as a kammback??


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
-----------------------------------------
good things come to those who wait, sh*t turns up pretty much instantly






twitter.com/bertchalmers
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 04:31 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 3,975
Thanks: 1,179
Thanked 807 Times in 469 Posts
not yet

Quote:
Originally Posted by robchalmers View Post
Does anyone make a 'backpack' for hatchback that could double as a kammback??
First,let me admit that I don't keep my head to the rails as far as the market goes,but so far,I've not seen any purpose-built packs tailored specifically for any particular vehicle.
And that would be a mandatory requirement for the proper function of a Kamm-form.
And due to the myriad sizes and shapes of hatchbacks,it would be prohibitively expensive to enter the game.
Consumer choice and lack of any industry rationalization becomes the double-edged sword.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 06:49 PM   #3 (permalink)
Gen II Prianista
 
Rokeby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ballamer, Merlin
Posts: 391
Thanks: 155
Thanked 98 Times in 59 Posts
You might check out AeroPACK Cargo Carriers

FWIW, it doesnt appear that it would work on a Prius due the suspension
straps pressing on the somewhat fragile rear spoiler.

Here's a German version that appears to be better engineered.

In either case, I doubt that it would enhance aero.

At best, when rigged on the back of the vehicle, they wouldn't degrade
areo very much.

Last edited by Rokeby; 05-19-2010 at 07:06 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2010, 12:08 AM   #4 (permalink)
Deadly Efficient
 
Tango Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 1,062

Olivia - '03 Vibe base
90 day: 38.61 mpg (US)

Silver Bullet - '00 Insight
90 day: 60.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 63 Times in 33 Posts
Here's a sketch of an idea I had awhile ago. Thought an aerodynamic luggage carrier for my Vibe could be made from 1/4" paneling, using "stitch and glue" process.



Was this what you had in mind, or were you thinking more of something that would sit behind the vehicle, like a hitch receiver-mounted thing?
__________________
-Terry





My Pet Threads:
Vibe Mods and What's in a UserName? and YKYAEI
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2010, 02:43 AM   #5 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 2,877

Svietlana - '05 307 SW
Diesel
90 day: 55.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 668
Thanked 361 Times in 229 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rokeby View Post
You might check out AeroPACK Cargo Carriers

Here's a German version that appears to be better engineered.

In either case, I doubt that it would enhance aero.

At best, when rigged on the back of the vehicle, they wouldn't degrade
areo very much.
The AeroPack claims fuel savings of 15%-25%! So it's better than a full boattail (15%)? Yeah, right.
The pictures on the German version also show how it doesn't mess with the airflow, but only on the Lupo, where it is mounted pretty low. On the other pics it's mounted way up in the airstream, acting like a spoiler or parachute.

Each time I look at my Kammbacked car (only 10-30 times per day) I can't help thinking how much more space I'd have if the rear window was moved to the end of the extension. I'm thinking more and more seriously about fabricating a Kammhatch.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell

Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2010, 04:06 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 645

Chug - '96 Polo CL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 49.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
those would do!

I've been toying with the idea of a detachable Fibreglass Kammback that doubles as a extra storage space. with the chunky styling of the polo it could be relatively 'easy'

the only reason I'd have it detatchable is so that the insurance would see it as a temporary addition and not a modification
__________________
-----------------------------------------
good things come to those who wait, sh*t turns up pretty much instantly






twitter.com/bertchalmers
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2010, 12:15 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 265

YJ - '89 Wrangler

FOCUS - '00 Focus ZTS

The Wife's Hot Rod - '09 G8 GT
Last 3: 23.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
[QUOTE=Piwoslaw;175376]The AeroPack claims fuel savings of 15%-25%! So it's better than a full boattail (15%)? Yeah, right.
QUOTE]

They state that a roof top cargo carrier increases fuel usage by 15-25%. By using the pack, Which has "no drag" you gain that back. One mfg. of these packs posted here that they were seeing what I remember as a .5-1% increase in MPG. I don't think they quoted that on their website though.

Don
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2010, 10:41 AM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: California
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Aero Luggage

To clarify: AeroPACK mounts on all hatch backs or lift gates and is made in USA. It does mount on a Prius with a short spoiler.

Roof mounting gear with a box, basket or racks creates a 17% to 25% mpg loss (Consumer Reports test data) depending on car and speeds. Edmunds performed a similar test and reported a 21% mpg loss with roof mounted gear.

AeroPACK when loaded, reduces eddy currents behind the vehicle. Some customers have reported mpg improvements, we make no guarantee.

It is much easier to load than climbing on the roof. Contact me at support@aeropackusa.com There are lots of happy AeroPACK owners.

Cheers....
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2010, 11:57 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,651
Thanks: 31
Thanked 237 Times in 171 Posts
The problem, though, is that if you put much weight back there, you mess up the car's weight distribution, and therefore the handling.

Why not a small trailer instead?
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2010, 12:29 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 645

Chug - '96 Polo CL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 49.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
quite happy to have extra weight out back as a trailer may hinder the corner performance or atleast my confidence on the limit :P


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
-----------------------------------------
good things come to those who wait, sh*t turns up pretty much instantly






twitter.com/bertchalmers
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Getting frustrated by lack of prior Aero modded Camry's pgmomni Aerodynamics 61 09-25-2010 10:19 AM
Commercial Aero Race Wheel covers (clear acrylic) cfg83 Aerodynamics 8 09-20-2010 11:09 PM
The Daq Civic aero project continues . . . slowly daqcivic Aerodynamics 34 02-09-2010 11:03 AM
CRV Cross Country Trip Aero - Temporary Aero Just for the Trip walteraxe Aerodynamics 26 01-05-2010 11:37 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com