07-14-2008, 11:07 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Ecomodding Dabbler
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 38
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Aero Mods for Our Odyssey
Well, I'm not about to do anything really radical to the family van, but tonight I completed my first aero mod to our 2001 Honday Odyssey van.
Before:
After:
No more roof rack crossbars!. I think we used it maybe once as designed in six+ years, so it's just wasting gas 99.999% of the time. Probably not a lot of frontal area reduced, but I'm confident it will help at least a little, and it only took a few minutes to do. Not only does this reduce drag, but it also removes 10 pounds or so of unneeded weight.
We've only been getting about 16 mpg in this van with all of the really short trips it does, but maybe this will give us 0.5 to 1.0 mgp improvement? We hope we detect some difference!
I'm leaving the side rails. They don't have much frontal area, are fairly smooth, and would be a pain to reinstall I think if I do need to use the rack sometime.
__________________
|
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 11:54 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Dartmouth 2010
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,421
Thanks: 92
Thanked 81 Times in 67 Posts
|
Dunno that you can expect that much increase, but it's a start. 
|
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 11:57 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,533
Thanks: 302
Thanked 1,019 Times in 568 Posts
|
At first I thought - man, the top of that Honda looks like it has a garage door pattern in the metal!
Don't forget, the side rails increase "apparent" frontal area in a cross wind.
But, it's a start - there's no need for them to be up there with that little use. Nice work.
|
|
|
|
10-27-2011, 12:37 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 345
Thanks: 2
Thanked 33 Times in 27 Posts
|
The entire upper grille can be blocked with no issues. The grille block on our 2002 has been on for 3 years with no heat issues, ever. It also helps increase the heat of the intake air by about 40 degrees iirc
I'm considering a full undertray for the next mod. Does anyone know if this has been done on an Ody? Any documented results?
|
|
|
|
02-02-2012, 08:42 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Graham, WA
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Kammback Odyssey
I've been wanting to add a partial kammback, fastened to the liftgate in place of the black plastic trailing edge that comes stock. Make it of clear or tinted lexan or acrylic to not interfere with vision too much, and end it such that it sticks up no higher than the bottom of the liftgate does when raised (to not hit the overhead door, for example).
Re: raising intake air temp- what's the point of diminishing returns? Cooling intake temps increases volumetric efficiency, since cold air is denser, that's part of the theory behind water injection; it cools the intake charge and also adds steam expansion.
Last edited by jray3; 02-02-2012 at 08:50 PM..
|
|
|
|
02-02-2012, 08:52 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 132
Thanks: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
For fuel economy you want lower volumetric efficiency because otherwise the engine expends energy to limit volumetric efficiency. I personally don't think that raising intake temperature is the right way to do it because when you actually want power you're going to cause some problems, but people do see gains.
Ideally, you would use cooled EGR or something like that. The Prius has it for example, and I think trucks have it for emissions reduction.
(sorry this post has nothing to do with aero :P)
|
|
|
|
02-02-2012, 08:55 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Schwinning!
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stillwater, MN
Posts: 990
Thanks: 310
Thanked 237 Times in 133 Posts
|
A very small step in the right direction. Any plans for a full belly pan? That would give you a couple MPG.
Edit... wtf? This thread is three years old.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weather Spotter
Nothing fell off so that is good.
|
|
|
|
|
02-02-2012, 09:05 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
haha someone was using the search
__________________
|
|
|
|
02-02-2012, 09:09 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,533
Thanks: 302
Thanked 1,019 Times in 568 Posts
|
I see no problem resurrecting dusty old threads if there's new info to add.
It's aliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiive!
|
|
|
|
02-04-2012, 02:33 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 3,975
Thanks: 1,179
Thanked 807 Times in 469 Posts
|
savings
Quote:
Originally Posted by sohl
Well, I'm not about to do anything really radical to the family van, but tonight I completed my first aero mod to our 2001 Honday Odyssey van.
Before:
After:
No more roof rack crossbars!. I think we used it maybe once as designed in six+ years, so it's just wasting gas 99.999% of the time. Probably not a lot of frontal area reduced, but I'm confident it will help at least a little, and it only took a few minutes to do. Not only does this reduce drag, but it also removes 10 pounds or so of unneeded weight.
We've only been getting about 16 mpg in this van with all of the really short trips it does, but maybe this will give us 0.5 to 1.0 mgp improvement? We hope we detect some difference!
I'm leaving the side rails. They don't have much frontal area, are fairly smooth, and would be a pain to reinstall I think if I do need to use the rack sometime.
|
If the cross pieces were 1/2-inch thick,I estimate that at a constant 60 mph,removing them would save approx. 0.007 gallons each hour.
|
|
|
|
|