Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-03-2011, 09:12 AM   #1 (permalink)
Prototype builder
 
jason1973tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 64

Sedona Prime - '04 Sedona LX
90 day: 22.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Aerow-E ( my new car design )

O.K. so I've started building the frame for my new car. I think I have finally started to get a handle on how Google Sketchup works. So I now have a general idea of what my car will look like in 3d. Tell me your opinion, how does it look and what would you change if anything?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Aerow-E.jpg (90.9 KB, 78 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 09:32 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 3,940

Mica Blue - '05 xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.22 mpg (US)

Josepha - '08 xD
90 day: 30.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 513
Thanked 501 Times in 306 Posts
Jason,

I might be able to help you with the SketchUp model -- PM me for my email, and send it to me if you like?

What version of SU are you using?
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 01:05 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 45

Slowpoke - '00 Sonata GLS
90 day: 32.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 25
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Looking at the name, it sounds like it's electric, so do have enough room for the batteries and components? Which end is the front? If it's the right side I would be concerned about lift cause of its wing shape. Just my $0.02
__________________


Slowly modding my 2000 sonata to what it should be... one project at a time.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 01:36 PM   #4 (permalink)
PSmodder lurker
 
botsapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chino
Posts: 537
Thanks: 11
Thanked 154 Times in 93 Posts
Give us an idea of your chassis, drivetrain & passenger/s areas, then a great aero package would emerge. Or is it the inverse, an aero shell, then...
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 03:19 PM   #5 (permalink)
Prototype builder
 
jason1973tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 64

Sedona Prime - '04 Sedona LX
90 day: 22.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I am using google sketchup 8.
The front is the left side actually. I plan to have a Mustang 2 type front suspension and thought about using two swingarms for the rear.
It will be a light weight two seater with batteries in front and behind the driver. It will sit very low, similar to a Corvette or Firebird. The panels on the front and rear will be clear and lights and plates will still sit vertically behind the aeroshaped plexiglass.
So far my chassis is about 50% done. I am using 1" square steel tube and framing it like a race car frame.

Last edited by jason1973tl; 01-03-2011 at 03:25 PM.. Reason: grammer
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 03:28 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 3,940

Mica Blue - '05 xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.22 mpg (US)

Josepha - '08 xD
90 day: 30.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 513
Thanked 501 Times in 306 Posts
Hi Jason,

If you can photograph the chassis from straight-on orthographic views, and give a few dimensions, the chassis could be modeled, so that the body shell could be modeled around it.

Is it a one person vehicle, or two? Any thoughts on the doors, etc.?
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NeilBlanchard For This Useful Post:
jason1973tl (01-03-2011)
Old 01-03-2011, 04:58 PM   #7 (permalink)
Prototype builder
 
jason1973tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 64

Sedona Prime - '04 Sedona LX
90 day: 22.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
The metal chassis it self is not in a position to be taken a picture of yet, still trying to sell the Firebird so I have room in my garage.
The chassis at the moment is 54" wide by 72" long for the interior section. The roof at the apex is where the passengers will sit side by side at 45" high. I haven't figured up the dimensions of the front yet. I am going to go with the front dimensions of a Locost roadster on the front end. I have more pics of the 3d in 2d if that helps viewing any.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Aerow-E front.jpg (90.1 KB, 18 views)
File Type: jpg Aerow-E rear.jpg (88.3 KB, 13 views)
File Type: jpg Aerow-E side passenger.jpg (102.4 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg Aerow-E side driver.jpg (102.5 KB, 16 views)
File Type: jpg Aerow-E top.jpg (72.5 KB, 10 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 06:28 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Failed State Belgium
Posts: 2,956

Hägar - '05 V50 1.6L Diesel
Diesel
90 day: 52.27 mpg (US)

Snert - '06 S40 1.6L Diesel
90 day: 58.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 283 Times in 228 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jason1973tl View Post
Tell me your opinion, how does it look and what would you change if anything?
What's the front of it ?
There's no aerodynamic need for pointy ends on the front.
A blunt front (using the aero-template) also gives more internal volume, and you can use more of the rest of the car's length to closely follow the aerotemplate.
Or you can make the car shorter (and therefore lighter).
You get most of the benefits from the aerotemplate's shape even when you abruptly cut it short using sharply defined, straight edges (i.e. a real Kammback).
Making it even shorter and lighter.
__________________



Lifetime fuel consumption :
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 06:43 PM   #9 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
I'd suggest modelling after the proven aero cars like 1L, any of the Probes or PNGVs, whatever. I don't think the man on the street is going to do better by eye than a professionally engineered, wind tunnel refined design. As you contemplate this more you may realize more of the shortcomings and unacceptable functionality compromises your current proposal has- better to consider them now, before you've invested time/effort/money building something.

Here's a lil thought experiment: I appears as though the driver's eyes will be about 6 feet away from the windshield. Maybe the effect can be approximated by sitting in the back seat of a TransPort dustbuster van and imagining driving it from there...

Another aspect is, you don't want sharp leading edges. Those A-pillars are going to have to change.

How about some boat-tailing- surely there are x-winds where you drive?

Ground clearance? Ramp angles for driveways and such? Solar gain? Reflections in the glass?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 06:45 PM   #10 (permalink)
Prototype builder
 
jason1973tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 64

Sedona Prime - '04 Sedona LX
90 day: 22.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Sounds good, I wasn't aware that a blunt front end has aerodynamic merit over a pointed one. I will have to look at it again.

I like the kammback idea, but was wondering how much different the aero would be as opposed to a full boat tail.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com