Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-29-2011, 06:52 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 70

Lone Ranger - '97 Ranger Splash
90 day: 28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Air deflector/bug shield

Hello all,

I don't think I have posted in the Aero forum before and I am not a very technical kinda guy so please bear with me.

I have a '97 Ford Ranger with a DIY upper grille block. The leading edge (?) of my hood is about 45* from vertical and the windshield is about 4' behind that and also about 45* from vertical. Not particularly aero in my mind but hey what do I know. That's why I'm asking here. Would/could it beneficial to fashoin an air deflector (sort of like the old bug deflectors) to help move the air across the hood and windshield and over the cab more efficiently? An angle trying to hit the top of the cab or possibly half way up the windshield. Not the deflector mind you, just the air flow. Something to help "smooth out" the air.

Thanks for the advice.
Hat_man


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2011, 07:24 PM   #2 (permalink)
Empty Pocketed Ecomodder
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 626

Gen - '05 Liberty Sport
90 day: 22.09 mpg (US)

Blurry - '03 Focus SE
90 day: 35.31 mpg (US)
Thanks: 33
Thanked 53 Times in 42 Posts
i would imagine the drag induced by such an air deflector (since you would have to move a bunch of air) would out-weigh any benefit of avoiding the transition between the hood and windshield, and then the windshield and roof.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2011, 08:38 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 29 Times in 23 Posts
I don't think bug deflectors help. They direct air upward, but that also creates vortices and turbulence behind the wake.

A 1997 Ranger's front end looks pretty aerodynamic to me anyway.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2011, 09:24 AM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 70

Lone Ranger - '97 Ranger Splash
90 day: 28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Thanks. I guess it just seemed rather steep to me. I had read here (somewhere) that cleaning up the front of the vehicle first really helps the "flow" at the back end. Guess I just wanted to start there and work my way back.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2011, 09:46 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Failed State Belgium
Posts: 2,956

Hägar - '05 V50 1.6L Diesel
Diesel
90 day: 52.27 mpg (US)

Snert - '06 S40 1.6L Diesel
90 day: 58.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 283 Times in 228 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hat_man View Post
Thanks. I guess it just seemed rather steep to me. I had read here (somewhere) that cleaning up the front of the vehicle first really helps the "flow" at the back end. Guess I just wanted to start there and work my way back.
Airflow at the rear is most important as it causes most of the drag.
It's also the most difficult to properly sort out.
An aerodynamic cover for the bed will help, reducing the size of the wake.

On the front, an air dam and grille block will help.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________



Lifetime fuel consumption :
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com