Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-10-2010, 02:01 AM   #1 (permalink)
My Goal: 35 MPG All City
 
RandomFact314's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 616

The Neon - '00 Neon
90 day: 25.38 mpg (US)

G/F's Car - Kyan - '01 Rio
90 day: 23.94 mpg (US)

The Accord - '97 Accord LX
90 day: 22.41 mpg (US)

Lizzy (all city) - '88 CRX Si
House of Tudor
90 day: 31.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Airpanes do it.......

I know this sounds ridiculous-ish but you know how people but spoilers on their trunk to make the wind push them down for more traction, if that works, couldnt you put one on backwards and have the air pull your car up, falsely removing weight, kinda like people in those air tunnels, the are is pushing you up so fast you float up (like being 200 pounds less)

Look at my ridiculous picture if you want an idea of what im thinking like:


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
Attached Images
File Type: png wtf.png (24.0 KB, 106 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2010, 02:09 AM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin
Posts: 145

Silver Bullet - '03 Protege LX
90 day: 39.39 mpg (US)

The Golden Turd - '01 Grand Caravan Sport
90 day: 16.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
you could absolutely create lift, but with lift comes drag. The short answer is, it wouldn't help.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2010, 02:42 AM   #3 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 2,877

Svietlana - '05 307 SW
Diesel
90 day: 55.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 668
Thanked 361 Times in 229 Posts
  1. By creating lift you may lose traction. Good for slightly reducing rolling resistance, but horrible if you actually want control over the car.
  2. You reduce weight, but not mass. Mass is what you have to haul up every hill, and what you have to pull each time you accelerate.And what tries to pull you out of the road when turning without enough traction (b/c you have too much lift, for example).
  3. There are ways to create lift without a big ol' spoiler sitting in the airstream. For example certain rear hatch and rear diffuser angles will increase lift (Cz on the drawings below), but usually at the cost of increasing drag (Cx).



__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell

Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Piwoslaw For This Useful Post:
Daox (09-10-2010)
Old 09-10-2010, 03:11 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Failed State Belgium
Posts: 2,956

Hägar - '05 V50 1.6L Diesel
Diesel
90 day: 52.27 mpg (US)

Snert - '06 S40 1.6L Diesel
90 day: 58.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 283 Times in 228 Posts
It looks like a great scheme, but in aeronautical engineering they have something called lift induced drag.
Basicly if you want to exploit the lift of a wing, you'll have to live with its drag as well.


But airplanes are often hypermiling, with flight crew incentives to do so.

Reducing fresh air to the cabine is like switching the car's AC off.
If you're getting a headache aboard, this is often why.

Changes in traffic control have the effect of coasting.
Rather than having approaching aircraft fly stepped approaches where they repeatedly descent and level out in horizontal flight (using fuel and causing noise), ATC improvements are now allowing for continuous descent approaches - "engine on coasting" down to the runway.
__________________



Lifetime fuel consumption :
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2010, 08:52 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,268

Appliance White - '93 Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Sprint Base
Thanks: 43
Thanked 144 Times in 109 Posts
Any wing that fits on a highway will be less efficient at supporting weight than wheels.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2010, 09:31 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
AeroModder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 424

Darwin - '96 Aspire 4 door
Team Ford
90 day: 44.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 53 Times in 39 Posts
That would be very dangerous at highway speeds. The mass doesn't go anywhere, and you'd be losing traction.
__________________
In Reason we Trust
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2010, 10:06 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: belgium, wi
Posts: 262

Bus - '94 School Bus huge

Stupid - '01 Blazer LS
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)

hawk - '00 Superhawk
Thanks: 2
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
There is another way to reduce weight on the wheels, drive it off a cliff. It is about as advisable.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com