Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-13-2010, 05:18 PM   #11 (permalink)
chop suey
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 6,639

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 559
Thanked 690 Times in 491 Posts
I haven't nailed down the base engine, but it appears to me to be an OHC 1 cylinder turbocharged 4 stroker; could be from a motorcycle or atv. There is something funky going on with that turbo on the compressor side I don't understand yet.

Back in '82 Pa got a Honda Big Red 3-wheeler. IIRC the single was 200cc. Back then I thought that engine and trans would make a PERFECT road vehicle drivetrain!!!

I'd imagine this engine to be 200-500cc.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 01-13-2010 at 06:16 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2010, 05:23 PM   #12 (permalink)
chop suey
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 6,639

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 559
Thanked 690 Times in 491 Posts
I don't like what I see re: rear suspension; from what I can tell both rear wheels HAVE to go up and down in unison, making them far less forgiving of different side-to-side bumps and undulations than even an old school live axle on leaf springs. Ride quality will suffer especially vs if they'd used a single wheel in the back.

Edit: Ha Ha, that'll learn me to open my yap before looking at all available info! My above comment was made after looking at the still pic of a rear axle on their site. Looked to me like it spanned the rear; it was the whole thing. NOW I see from the video that there are two of them. Damn but that thing has wide tracks! Incidentally, it sure sounds just like an atv to me... Carry on...

Outside of perhaps this induction thing I don't get, I don't see anything earthshaking as far as new. However, that's not to say I don't love it!!! Were I to enter the X-Prize or even just build my own, they are using the approach I would have. Except I wouldn't put that 4th wheel on there unless the rules required it.

I'd rather have this than an Aptera. They've waved too many red flags already, they have the taste of scammers, almost Palmear-like. Plus their proposals are too expensive for what you get.
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 01-16-2010 at 04:08 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2010, 05:33 PM   #13 (permalink)
dcb
needs more cowbell
 
dcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ˙
Posts: 5,024

pimp mobile - '81 gs 250 t
90 day: 96.29 mpg (US)

schnitzel - '01 Golf TDI
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 153
Thanked 256 Times in 202 Posts
I assume you are scratching your head over the large tank like thing on the left of the live foto? looks like some sort of accumulator? Or a diversion?

re suspension, the rear (swingarm) suspension looks like the triangular transfer case gets bolted to the end of the tube so each wheel would be independantly sprung. the springs look like they are inboard on the "kuttner behind the wheel" photo
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2010, 05:36 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 3,743

Mica Blue - '05 xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 45.16 mpg (US)

Josepha - '08 xD
90 day: 30.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 414 Times in 257 Posts
The front suspension is a bit of a mystery: the tube appears to be solid all the way across, but whatever is behind the wheels is not visible. If there is any suspension at all, it would have to involve a trailing swing arm, and combining this with steering would seem to be awkward...

__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2010, 05:39 PM   #15 (permalink)
chop suey
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 6,639

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 559
Thanked 690 Times in 491 Posts
I only see one spring/shock for the rear axle assy.

I don't get the "accumilator" nor anything, really, on the induction side of the turbo.

Regardless, this is my favorite entry so far!

These guys give me the impression of rejecting gimmicks and are grounded in sound, tried 'n' true engineering. Yeah baby!
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2010, 05:42 PM   #16 (permalink)
chop suey
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 6,639

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 559
Thanked 690 Times in 491 Posts
Post 14: in that pic I see an atv plastic gas tank and a cooler, presumably a turbo intercooler. I don't see the wierd stuff of the lab engine.

Front suspension/steering is a mystery to me too.

OK All four wheels are on short trailing arms; I suppose it is possible for there to be torsion springs in there too, in addition to the coil spring/shock, but that doesn't seem likely.
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 01-13-2010 at 05:49 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2010, 05:49 PM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 347
Thanks: 25
Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts
If I had to speculate on the suspension I'd suggest it's a trailing arm using the beam's torsion (or a separate, interior beam's torsion) as its spring. The beam itself may not be fully circular, lending a plane on which it can resolve torsion. That doesn't resolve the question of damping however, maybe an internal fluid shock? Possibly some trick of mass, where the whole assembly is so light that it can't pick up any road harmonics at any realistic speed so a fluid damper is almost unnecessary?
__________________
2001 ZR2 Blazer e85/gas flex
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2010, 05:50 PM   #18 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,914

Blackfly - '98 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 67.07 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 107.11 mpg (US)

U.F.O. - '00 Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 83.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 239
Thanked 848 Times in 471 Posts
FYI, the engine image in post 1 is an attachment (because their site wasn't reliably serving the image as a direct link - hope they don't mind).

The original image is called "early engine simple but good.jpg"
__________________
Latest project: removable Geo Metro boat tail
Latest test: Massive cardboard air dam on a Geo Metro


www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2010, 06:53 PM   #19 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 1,651
Thanks: 539
Thanked 93 Times in 54 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
ABG called it a "poor man's Aptera". Not very nice! (Probably not true, either.) Coincidentally, there's an Aptera in the left side of the above photo.

Web site: Edison2: The Very Light Car (X PRIZE Contender) - The Very Light Car
Well, I'm a poor man.

How much is the cost ? I didn't see it on their site.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2010, 07:47 PM   #20 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,502

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 SW2 Wagon
90 day: 42.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 340
Thanked 418 Times in 286 Posts
Hello -

It reminds me of this :

HyperRocket: hot looking 125mpg reverse trike on Ebay

Did someone save some pictures of that trike? The ebay link is dead. Both designs are by engineers for engineers.

(note: I say EV1 in the next paragraph, but maybe I am talking about the Impact concept prototype).

When the EV1 was being developed, the Aeroviroment engineers created their own versions of the EV1. The GM car-designers were horrified at what they saw, but were designing terrible cars from an aero-POV. Eventually they came up with a design that *worked* for both sides and was closer to the Aerovironment design.

I have a hunch that the Aerovironment fellows came up with proposals similar to this.

CarloSW2


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society

Last edited by cfg83; 01-13-2010 at 07:52 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Electric car conversion: Project ForkenSwift MetroMPG Fossil Fuel Free 979 12-26-2011 10:37 AM
EcoModding for Beginners: Getting great gas mileage. SVOboy EcoModding Central 54 05-08-2011 11:19 PM
Coasting experiment: engine on VS engine off on a fixed route = 12.9% gain MetroMPG Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 6 02-22-2008 09:38 AM
Automotive X Prize - would a modded Civic VX make it? Krieg EcoModding Central 31 01-02-2008 08:06 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com