11-28-2007, 02:47 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 8,658
Thanks: 23
Thanked 68 Times in 49 Posts
|
OK, smartypants... if a cam swap can improve efficiency, why don't all Metros have this kind of cam?
Because the cam profile is not good for top end performance. Lowers the redline (valves are more prone to floating than with the stock cam).
Remember the XFi also has a taller than regular final drive, so its cam profile goes better with that.
|
|
|
|
11-28-2007, 02:49 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 8,658
Thanks: 23
Thanked 68 Times in 49 Posts
|
Cam update (originally written March 14/07)
Have I mentioned yet how much I like what this has done to the character of the engine? I really like it. It's so much more suited to my driving style.
I would recommend this mod to any Metro owner, particularly in combination with the longer legs. If I had the chance to buy an XFi over a regular Metro, I'd do it just for the difference in the way (I imagine) it drives.
I'm starting to realize I'd probably also really like driving a manual shift diesel for the same reasons - low end torque, short shifting, quiet, laid back, un-fussy.
|
|
|
|
11-28-2007, 02:49 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 8,658
Thanks: 23
Thanked 68 Times in 49 Posts
|
For anyone following this thread, I've updated MetroMPG.com with a post summarizing the issues, installation, and (predominantly subjective) results of installing the cam in my car. Most of what you've read here is included, with some new bits added:
International heart transplant: the Blackfly gets an XFi cam - MetroMPG.com
|
|
|
|
01-22-2008, 10:42 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 8,658
Thanks: 23
Thanked 68 Times in 49 Posts
|
For those wanting another Metro owner's perspective on the cam swap, Frederick has a thread about his car: Another Metro to get taller final drive & XFi cam
|
|
|
|
01-22-2008, 11:20 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Wannabe EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston, MA; Nashua, NH; Houston, TX
Posts: 404
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Pretty cool thread you resurrected here! I never realized swapping a cam could resulting in any significant improvements.
|
|
|
|
07-03-2008, 03:20 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Troy, Ohio
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
What is the Lift/Duration (@.050" - Not Advertised #) for the XFi Camshaft ? 
|
|
|
|
07-03-2008, 03:50 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Less IS more!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: St-Ours
Posts: 47
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I have been driving Espresso for a few months.
It has the XFi cam and a taller gear, actually TALLER than a regular XFi. I got it from a 4 cyl, SOHC.
When asked by members of The Order Of Canada yesterday which car did I prefer: Vanilla Latte with a stock turbo swap or Espresso Nero. I could not lie, even though my lips were stained cherry red:
The XfI cammed one. Sirs.
Yes, Espresso Nero, is a joy to ride. Particularly when passing.................... gas stations.
__________________
Less IS more !
|
|
|
|
10-25-2008, 03:34 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Carson City, Nv
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
I just installed the XFI regrind in my latest 92 Metro convertible. Stock gear ratio, 13" tires at 32psi, 8 degree cam advance, Mobile 1 synthetic ATF in my transaxle, seat of the pants ignition advance. With the top up and windows closed I used .78 gallons of fuel in 41.6 miles for 53.3 miles per gallon. I filled the gas right to the filler neck 1/2 inch above the flapper and shook the car to get any air out and repeated the procedure at the end of the trip. Top speed was 65mph for short periods and there were a few traffic lights before getting on the highways. Average speed was 60.
My previous best on the same trip was 44mpg stock with 90w gear oil in the trans. Only a long term average will show accurate results. But I am certain that I am using far less throttle opening and it has more torque at lower rpm. I will be trying Singh grooves in the head as soon as my gaskets and head bolts arrive. I like the feel of the XFI cam and really appreciate the fuel economy boost while I keep my same driving habits.
|
|
|
|
|