Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-13-2009, 07:24 PM   #11 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,037

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.85 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 28.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 51
Thanked 266 Times in 204 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1 View Post
Thats retarded.
...nah, it seems to work OK for the Indianapolis, Talladega and NASCAR raceways...as well as for the cities of Boston and Phoenix, to name a few existing examples.

...it's just a spoke and hub arrangement.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SIDI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970˝ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2009, 07:56 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Victoria , Australia.
Posts: 468
Thanks: 9
Thanked 36 Times in 28 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrk View Post
Public transport (buses) and cars have different requeriments:
In a car, you would prefer that traffic lights go green as you approach, "green waves" go with the traffic flow and once you are in a "green wave" you don't stop - unless you are too slow and a "red wave" catches you.
In a bus, since it has to stop constantly, you would miss those "waves" all the time... then if you want to favour public transport (better overall FE!!) those "green waves" go against traffic, but it is totally inconvenient for cars...
Maximum overall efficency is not as easy as it seems

-- My brother gave me this explanation once, he is a road engineer --
I agree a bus constantly stopping would catch different wave patterns than a car which is not stopping but the bus would still catch some although they would be different waves from the cars.

In other words one car would catch a green wave all the way and the bus having to stop would have the wave go on without it.

The bus would discharge some passengers , collect others and go again catching the next wave until it was required to stop again and repeat the process.

Given the volume of exhaust emissions saved by keeping the cars constantly moving this would outweigh the inconvenience of having the bus out of synch with the waves.

Pete.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2009, 09:49 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,468
Thanks: 16
Thanked 175 Times in 127 Posts
How about going a bit further? Every traffic light broadcasts its timing - X seconds until I turn red - and a GPS-like receiver in the car indicates what speed to drive to catch the green. If you have the lights with cameras sensors, it could even try figuring out how many cars are waiting...
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2009, 11:58 PM   #14 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kenly NC
Posts: 152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
This is good to see an automaker pushing this topic.

Of course, they're absolutely right that better traffic light timing saves fuel... but it doesn't change the vehicle's government fuel economy ratings. Which makes me wonder...

Aside from the PR, what incentive does the company have for pursuing this?

Exactly that. Good PR, and it costs them nothing at all to suggest. But even so, good advice!
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2009, 12:34 AM   #15 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,502

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 SW2 Wagon
90 day: 42.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 340
Thanked 418 Times in 286 Posts
Old Tele man -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
...nah, it seems to work OK for the
Indianapolis, Talladega and NASCAR raceways...as well as for the cities of Boston and Phoenix, to name a few existing examples.

...it's just a spoke and hub arrangement.
I wish I had a picture, but Los Angeles' urban planners had a proposal for continuous "parkways" (back in the 1930's, I think). I am pretty sure that there were no left turns (3 rights make a left). When you came to an intersection, you drove over or under a bridge. The far right lanes were "right turn only" lanes for merging into the flow of traffic. The right hand turn-curves would cost you the four corner lots of the intersection.

CarloSW2


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com