Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-05-2008, 01:22 AM   #11 (permalink)
MechE
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,151

The Miata - '01 Mazda MX-5 Miata
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LostCause View Post

Aluminum Flywheel:
I'd like to know. I'd assume lowering reciprocating mass would lower friction/energy consumed, but it kills the idle and makes it easier to stall. Some first had testing would be nice...


High-Output Alternator:
Not too sure on this. I don't know whether a larger alternator could charge a battery faster than one smaller...which is the only area I could see a decrease in engine load.

- LostCause
Car Flywheels don't reciprocate

And I agree about the alternator issue... The rating for an alternator is max output - not nominal. Being able to charge faster isn't necessary a good thing - and even then, it's more load over for a shorter duration...

__________________
Cars have not created a new problem. They merely made more urgent the necessity to solve existing ones.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-05-2008, 03:05 AM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Minded
 
Chris D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 667

Lunar Mist - '02 Toyota Tacoma SR5
90 day: 25.31 mpg (US)

Silver Streak - '08 Toyota Corolla S
90 day: 38.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 25 Times in 12 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Chris D.
Quote:
Originally Posted by diesel_john View Post
what does this john deere link have to do with what this post is about?

typo?


Quote:
Originally Posted by LostCause View Post
I can't imagine mechanical fans working on anything but longitudinally mounted engines, which are really only common to trucks, SUV's, sports cars, and classic cars. They are probably still being used because they are cheap, and with a fluid clutch can still be effective/efficient.

Thats what I have, a front engined rear wheel drive truck..
they use em on just about every rwd truck out there..


Headers:
Any aftermarket exhaust is going to be interested in high-hp, which is not useful for hypermiling. Headers that are "tuned" to shift the torque band into lower rpm's would be useful, but they would probably have to be custom made and mated to higher gearing to be useful.

so a direct fitment mite not be the way to roll then?

Freeflow Exhaust:
I don't see much of a benefit as under hypermiling conditions the exhaust shouldn't be much of a constriction.

I can see it from that point of view, but what about in reguards to FE and low end torque?

Electrical --> Mechanical Fan:
Beneficial, especially if the fan is not clutched (unlikely). I've seen people switch from clutched fans to electric fans and record a mpg/hp improvement, but I bet the improvement is less than moving from an unclutched fan.

I'm not sure if its clutched or not..
but I'll find out..


Aluminum Flywheel:
I'd like to know. I'd assume lowering reciprocating mass would lower friction/energy consumed, but it kills the idle and makes it easier to stall. Some first had testing would be nice...

reciprocating? maybe rotational.. thats a new one to me..

google a "reciprocating saw" and compaire that to what a flywheel does..

In terms of street/driveability, takes a little bit to get used to it ,
but it was very daily drivable.. made a great deal of difference in acceleration and hp difference in a race vehicle i had, not sure about FE goals tho


Underdrive Pulley:
I would expect a marginal improvement in mileage, but I have no idea of the impact on the cooling or oil pump. An underpullied alternator will probably make up the speed difference by increasing field current (i.e. no MPG gain). Removing items from the circuit (alternator delete, electric coolant pump, etc.) will see bigger gains.

alternator delete? how far would ya get till you kill the battery then the ecu looses proper voltage and your DOA.. I donno about that.

High-Output Alternator:
Not too sure on this. I don't know whether a larger alternator could charge a battery faster than one smaller...which is the only area I could see a decrease in engine load.

Its something I want to do for stereo equipment and having an onboard compressor setup..

- LostCause
Chris D.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 08:47 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903

honda cb125 - '74 Honda CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuter Vehicles Inc. Commuti-Car

Blue VX - '93 Honda Civic VX
Thanks: 867
Thanked 433 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTFM8 View Post
Is it just large pickups and SUVs that come with belt-driven fans anymore? I'm wondering why this design hasn't been phased out, since the electric just makes more sense. I suppose this can be likened to air-cooled vs. water-cooled motorcycle designs.

In the case your car came with an engine-propelled fan, I do think the electrical replace would help.
They have the mechanical driven fan because it's more efficient if the fan is running most of the time, like in a truck! trucks are designed to be under load, as I said before, it's less efficient to convert mechanical to electrical and back to mechanical if it's going to be running 80% of the time that the vehicle is running, my cars fan rarely comes on, the fan on the truck at work is almost always on, why? because it's a truck, and is normally hauling a 5,000+ pound trailer.

If you are using the truck as a sales vehicle, or to tote the kids around, then yes, go with an electric fan, if you use it for it's intended perpus, then stick with the direct drive fan.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 09:53 AM   #14 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
I'd definitly agree with Ryland, and most of what LostCause said.

A header properly designed for economy (which eliminates 99% of the headers out there) will give you more more low rpm torque instead of high rpm torque. If you are driving for fuel economy you will never use high rpms so that extra high rpm torque is completely wasted. As mentioned, you'd have to have one custom designed and fabricated. Last I checked this costs upwards of $1000+.

A free flowing exhaust does exactly the same thing, more high rpm torque which you will never use if driving for fuel economy.

I agree with Rylands comments on the E-fan and aluminum flywheel.

Underdrive pulleys can provide benefits, but you have to live with reduced output from your water pump and alternator then. That means you'll lower your towing capacity due to not being able to disperse enough heat, and you won't be able to use that nice big ol sterio that you want.


Personally, the only one I'd even look into on your list is an electric fan.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 02:24 PM   #15 (permalink)
Driving God
 
WTFM8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 31

Yoko - '97 Honda Civic HX
90 day: 40.04 mpg (US)

Big Red - '91 Honda CB750 Nighthawk
90 day: 46.29 mpg (US)

Fiddy - '01 Honda SR 50 Elite
Last 3: 97.85 mpg (US)

Trolly - '01 Trek 7200 Multitrack Hybrid Road
90 day: 22.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryland View Post
They have the mechanical driven fan because it's more efficient if the fan is running most of the time, like in a truck! trucks are designed to be under load, as I said before, it's less efficient to convert mechanical to electrical and back to mechanical if it's going to be running 80% of the time that the vehicle is running, my cars fan rarely comes on, the fan on the truck at work is almost always on, why? because it's a truck, and is normally hauling a 5,000+ pound trailer.

If you are using the truck as a sales vehicle, or to tote the kids around, then yes, go with an electric fan, if you use it for it's intended perpus, then stick with the direct drive fan.
You know, I've only ever open my truck's hood during oil changes. I really should take a look at that design. I suppose the fan design goes along with most of the other engineering in the truck, which seems to be absolute overkill for commuting, but comes in handy when you're pull a trailer with a loaded bed, which is what these vehicles were meant for.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 05:13 PM   #16 (permalink)
Liberti
 
LostCause's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: California
Posts: 504

Thunderbird - '96 Ford Thunderbird
90 day: 27.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by trebuchet03 View Post
Car Flywheels don't reciprocate
Good point...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris D.
alternator delete? how far would ya get till you kill the battery then the ecu looses proper voltage and your DOA.. I donno about that.
MetroMPG did an alternator delete awhile ago and saw a 10% mileage increase. He used a deep cycle battery and topped it up at home with a trickle charger, I believe. As a safety measure, he kept a custom serpentine belt in the car so the alternator could be reattached if needed.

You run the risk of destroying batteries if you deeply discharge them (depends on commute length), but the potential savings are large.

Quote:
Its something I want to do for stereo equipment and having an onboard compressor setup...
This will probably work against you since subs, amps, and heavy gauge wiring are all pretty heavy. A large alternator will encourage you to add more extravagence (weight) to your car. The compressor might be useful if it allows your to vary your ride height, but your car is already lowered.

- LostCause
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 07:05 PM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Minded
 
Chris D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 667

Lunar Mist - '02 Toyota Tacoma SR5
90 day: 25.31 mpg (US)

Silver Streak - '08 Toyota Corolla S
90 day: 38.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 25 Times in 12 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Chris D.
I'd kill it with my stereo..

what good is a vehicle without some somfort features..

if I wanted a super ultra mega commuter I'd gut out a festiva so it only had a steering wheel and pedels..

My vehicle makes me money, thats about the only difference
between mine and the majority of other people on here..
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 09:28 PM   #18 (permalink)
Driving God
 
WTFM8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 31

Yoko - '97 Honda Civic HX
90 day: 40.04 mpg (US)

Big Red - '91 Honda CB750 Nighthawk
90 day: 46.29 mpg (US)

Fiddy - '01 Honda SR 50 Elite
Last 3: 97.85 mpg (US)

Trolly - '01 Trek 7200 Multitrack Hybrid Road
90 day: 22.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris D. View Post

My vehicle makes me money, thats about the only difference
between mine and the majority of other people on here..
Oh really? I work as a courier part-time, so my car pays for itself and then some.

Plus, I'd say that anyone who drives to work in a car has a vehicle that "makes them money."
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 09:32 PM   #19 (permalink)
Liberti
 
LostCause's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: California
Posts: 504

Thunderbird - '96 Ford Thunderbird
90 day: 27.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
I drive to school in my car, so does that mean my vehicle helps me lose money x 2?

- LostCause
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 11:41 PM   #20 (permalink)
EcoModding Minded
 
Chris D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 667

Lunar Mist - '02 Toyota Tacoma SR5
90 day: 25.31 mpg (US)

Silver Streak - '08 Toyota Corolla S
90 day: 38.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 25 Times in 12 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Chris D.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTFM8 View Post
Oh really? I work as a courier part-time, so my car pays for itself and then some.

Plus, I'd say that anyone who drives to work in a car has a vehicle that "makes them money."
you know what I mean..

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SuperMID - Fuel Economy Display SVOboy Instrumentation 25 05-15-2015 09:16 PM
How to calculate MPG / fuel economy formula MetroMPG DIY / How-to 29 11-25-2013 06:47 PM
What features on your ULTIMATE fuel economy instrumentation? MetroMPG Instrumentation 41 05-12-2012 01:14 PM
Why SUV fuel economy is so much more important than small car fuel economy... SVOboy General Efficiency Discussion 30 02-23-2009 06:26 PM
Basic EcoDriving Techniques and Instrumentation SVOboy Instrumentation 2 11-17-2007 11:38 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com